Determinants of professional burnout of special school employees

Agnieszka Kowalczyk
{"title":"Determinants of professional burnout of special school employees","authors":"Agnieszka Kowalczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the research was to diagnose the phenomenon of professional burnout of special school employees. The research was conducted among employees of special schools in the Opolskie Voivodeship. The method used in the research was a diagnostic survey. The research tool was selected by adapting the Maslach's occupational burnout questionnaire for the research purposes. Considering all three dimensions of professional burnout, the results of the research show that the dominant group is the group of people with a low level of emotional exhaustion, low depersonalization and a high level of reduced sense of personal achievements. In all three dimensions of professional burnout, no statistically significant difference was observed between women and men working in special schools. Age, professional experience and the degree of professional promotion are factors correlating with emotional exhaustion and risk factors increasing the depersonalised approach to their charges. Special school teachers work at different levels of education, but this is not related to the professional burnout. The number of subjects they teach influences the symptoms of the burnout process. Employees of special schools are not a burned out group because none of the respondents meets the criterion of full-blown professional burnout, i.e. has a high level of emotional exhaustion, a high level of depersonalization and a reduced sense of personal achievements. At the same time, they are a group with a very reduced sense of personal achievements, as it is declared by as many as 98.10% of the respondents. Therefore, actions should be taken to change the perception of employees and teachers about their work or to look at the criteria that are used to evaluate (or self-evaluate) their work. If a different method of research were used, the conclusions could be slightly different, even completely different.\n\n","PeriodicalId":371798,"journal":{"name":"Special School","volume":"353 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the research was to diagnose the phenomenon of professional burnout of special school employees. The research was conducted among employees of special schools in the Opolskie Voivodeship. The method used in the research was a diagnostic survey. The research tool was selected by adapting the Maslach's occupational burnout questionnaire for the research purposes. Considering all three dimensions of professional burnout, the results of the research show that the dominant group is the group of people with a low level of emotional exhaustion, low depersonalization and a high level of reduced sense of personal achievements. In all three dimensions of professional burnout, no statistically significant difference was observed between women and men working in special schools. Age, professional experience and the degree of professional promotion are factors correlating with emotional exhaustion and risk factors increasing the depersonalised approach to their charges. Special school teachers work at different levels of education, but this is not related to the professional burnout. The number of subjects they teach influences the symptoms of the burnout process. Employees of special schools are not a burned out group because none of the respondents meets the criterion of full-blown professional burnout, i.e. has a high level of emotional exhaustion, a high level of depersonalization and a reduced sense of personal achievements. At the same time, they are a group with a very reduced sense of personal achievements, as it is declared by as many as 98.10% of the respondents. Therefore, actions should be taken to change the perception of employees and teachers about their work or to look at the criteria that are used to evaluate (or self-evaluate) their work. If a different method of research were used, the conclusions could be slightly different, even completely different.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊学校员工职业倦怠的影响因素
本研究的目的是诊断特殊学校员工的职业倦怠现象。这项研究是在奥波尔斯基省特殊学校的员工中进行的。研究中使用的方法是诊断性调查。本研究采用马斯拉克职业倦怠问卷作为研究工具。考虑到职业倦怠的三个维度,研究结果表明,主导群体是情绪耗竭程度低、去人格化程度低、个人成就感降低程度高的人群。在职业倦怠的三个维度上,在特殊学校工作的男女之间没有统计学上的显著差异。年龄、专业经验和专业晋升程度是与情绪耗竭和风险因素相关的因素,增加了对其收费的去人格化方法。特殊学校教师工作在不同的教育水平,但这与职业倦怠无关。他们教的科目数量会影响倦怠过程的症状。特殊学校的员工并不是一个职业倦怠的群体,因为没有一个被调查者达到职业倦怠的标准,即有高度的情绪耗竭、高度的人格解体和降低的个人成就感。与此同时,多达98.10%的受访者表示,他们是一个个人成就感非常低的群体。因此,应该采取行动来改变员工和教师对他们工作的看法,或者看看用来评估(或自我评估)他们工作的标准。如果使用不同的研究方法,结论可能会略有不同,甚至完全不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School difficulties of a visually impaired child with Foetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS). Case study Skills necessary to conduct a competent conversation with the ward in social rehabilitation work Are Immature Neuromotor Skills Significant Factors in Educational Under-achievement and Special Educational Needs? Literature review of the role of Primitive Reflexes as Indicators and Measures of Neuromotor Immaturity Maria Grzegorzewska's indications from 1918 on special education.Origins and activity of the State Institute for Special Pedagogics (19221976) Agnieszka Duniewska: Understanding literary texts by students with hearing impairment. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls, Krakw 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1