Examining Academic Stress and Its Source Among Nursing Professional Students (Ners) Using the Modified Perception of Academic Stress Scale (PAS)

Wahyu Rochdiat Murdhiono, Venny Vidayanti
{"title":"Examining Academic Stress and Its Source Among Nursing Professional Students (Ners) Using the Modified Perception of Academic Stress Scale (PAS)","authors":"Wahyu Rochdiat Murdhiono, Venny Vidayanti","doi":"10.24990/injec.v7i1.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Nurse professional students experienced academic stress due to the changing mode of learning to online learning. Academic stress also have a negative impact on the achievement of nursing profession students' competencies. There is an urgent need study to measure academic stress experienced by nursing professional students using a tailored and valid instrument.Method: This study is a quantitative study used survey design to measure academic stress in nursing students at the professional stage using a modified questionnaire from the Perceived Academic Stress Scale (PAS). There were 339 nursing students in profession phase from private college in Yogyakarta. Respondents were obtained by consecutive sampling technique. The psychometric testing of the modified PAS academic stress scale attempts to determine the instrument's internal, external, and reliability for use with nursing professional students. Internal validity was determined in two methods in this study: by examining corrected item-total correlation and by doing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on each produced item. The instrument's external validity is determined by administering it to two specialists in mental nursing and nursing education.Results: The developed instrument has internal consistency reliability of 0.818 (Cronbach’s alpha), there was evidence for content validity, and factor analysis resulted in five correlated and theoretically meaningful factors. Based in this instrument, most students experience moderate academic stress during their learning at the professional program phase.Conclusions: The modified PAS instrument used in this study is a tailored, valid and trustworthy for measuring academic stress of nursing professional students during pandemic Covid-19.","PeriodicalId":431220,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24990/injec.v7i1.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Nurse professional students experienced academic stress due to the changing mode of learning to online learning. Academic stress also have a negative impact on the achievement of nursing profession students' competencies. There is an urgent need study to measure academic stress experienced by nursing professional students using a tailored and valid instrument.Method: This study is a quantitative study used survey design to measure academic stress in nursing students at the professional stage using a modified questionnaire from the Perceived Academic Stress Scale (PAS). There were 339 nursing students in profession phase from private college in Yogyakarta. Respondents were obtained by consecutive sampling technique. The psychometric testing of the modified PAS academic stress scale attempts to determine the instrument's internal, external, and reliability for use with nursing professional students. Internal validity was determined in two methods in this study: by examining corrected item-total correlation and by doing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on each produced item. The instrument's external validity is determined by administering it to two specialists in mental nursing and nursing education.Results: The developed instrument has internal consistency reliability of 0.818 (Cronbach’s alpha), there was evidence for content validity, and factor analysis resulted in five correlated and theoretically meaningful factors. Based in this instrument, most students experience moderate academic stress during their learning at the professional program phase.Conclusions: The modified PAS instrument used in this study is a tailored, valid and trustworthy for measuring academic stress of nursing professional students during pandemic Covid-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用改进的学业压力感知量表(PAS)调查护理专业学生的学业压力及其来源
摘要简介:护理专业学生因学习方式向网络学习转变而产生学业压力。学业压力对护理专业学生胜任力的实现也有负面影响。目前迫切需要研究一种适合护理专业学生的有效的学业压力测量方法。方法:本研究采用问卷调查法,采用修改后的《认知学业压力量表》(PAS)问卷,对护理专业阶段学生的学业压力进行定量研究。日惹市私立大学护理专业学生339名。调查对象采用连续抽样方法。修正PAS学业压力量表的心理测量测试试图确定该工具在护理专业学生中使用的内部、外部和可靠性。本研究采用两种方法来确定内部效度:通过检验校正后的项目-总相关性和对每个生产项目进行探索性因子分析(EFA)。通过对两名心理护理和护理教育专家进行管理,确定了该工具的外部效度。结果:所研制的量表内部一致性信度为0.818 (Cronbach’s alpha),内容效度存在证据,因子分析得到5个相关且具有理论意义的因子。在此基础上,大多数学生在专业课程阶段的学习中都经历了适度的学业压力。结论:本研究使用的改进PAS仪器是一种量身定制的、有效的、值得信赖的护理专业学生在Covid-19大流行期间的学业压力测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web-Based Triage Game Application Development as A Disaster Triage Learning Tools During The Covid-19 Pandemic for Nursing Students Correlation between Psychological Distress and Coping Mechanism Strategy among Health Workers with Confirmed COVID-19 The Effect of Discovery Learning Method on Students’ Self-Motivation Through Online Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic Effect of Positive Self-Talk on Anxiety Among Patients with Covid-19 The Relationship between the Degree of Stressors and the Coping Strategies of Older Adult Living in Nursing Home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1