Teaching and Learning via Technology: Digital Feedback

Adam Gray
{"title":"Teaching and Learning via Technology: Digital Feedback","authors":"Adam Gray","doi":"10.24834/jotl.1.2.583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written formative-feedback within most university courses has been proven to be limited in its scope and content, with time being a limited resource, resulting in written feedback often being unclear, vague, and confusing. However, feedback using screen-capture videos can be more effective than written feedback, particularly for formative-evaluations, creating beneficial synergy between learning-activities and learning-outcomes. Notwithstanding evidence, the consensus of many teachers is that written-feedback is faster than video-feedback, so screen-capture video is seldom used. \nThis paper makes two points: video screen-capture enhances feedback and using feedback via screen-capture video instead of written-feedback is a superior method of formative evaluation, saving time and helping students reach learning outcomes; additionally, filming lectures with embedded power-points, making them available to students, can be important for formative feedback. These time-saving methods have been applied to two courses at Malmö University, i.e. “Basic English Grammar Skills for University” and “Basic English Writing and Presenting Skills for University”.","PeriodicalId":129745,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education at Malmö University","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education at Malmö University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24834/jotl.1.2.583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Written formative-feedback within most university courses has been proven to be limited in its scope and content, with time being a limited resource, resulting in written feedback often being unclear, vague, and confusing. However, feedback using screen-capture videos can be more effective than written feedback, particularly for formative-evaluations, creating beneficial synergy between learning-activities and learning-outcomes. Notwithstanding evidence, the consensus of many teachers is that written-feedback is faster than video-feedback, so screen-capture video is seldom used. This paper makes two points: video screen-capture enhances feedback and using feedback via screen-capture video instead of written-feedback is a superior method of formative evaluation, saving time and helping students reach learning outcomes; additionally, filming lectures with embedded power-points, making them available to students, can be important for formative feedback. These time-saving methods have been applied to two courses at Malmö University, i.e. “Basic English Grammar Skills for University” and “Basic English Writing and Presenting Skills for University”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过技术进行教学:数字反馈
事实证明,大多数大学课程中的书面形成反馈在范围和内容上都是有限的,时间是有限的资源,导致书面反馈往往不清楚、模糊和令人困惑。然而,使用屏幕捕捉视频的反馈可能比书面反馈更有效,特别是对于形成性评估,在学习活动和学习成果之间创造有益的协同作用。尽管有证据,但许多教师的共识是书面反馈比视频反馈更快,因此很少使用屏幕捕捉视频。本文提出两点观点:视频截屏增强了反馈,使用截屏视频代替书面反馈是一种更好的形成性评价方法,节省了时间,帮助学生达到学习成果;此外,用嵌入式幻灯片录制讲座,并将其提供给学生,对于形成性反馈很重要。这些省时的方法已经应用于Malmö大学的两门课程,即“大学基本英语语法技巧”和“大学基本英语写作与表达技巧”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Internationalising the Curriculum: Benefits and Challenges in a Swedish Case Att handleda och inkludera normbrytande doktorander Akademisk litteracitet och uppsatsskrivande Handledning: en mångfacetterad arbetsallians Möjligheter, utmaningar och hinder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1