A Model to Explain Statewide Differences in COVID-19 Death Rates

J. Doti
{"title":"A Model to Explain Statewide Differences in COVID-19 Death Rates","authors":"J. Doti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3731803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 death rates per 100,000 vary widely across the nation. As of September 1, 2020, they range from a low of 4 in Hawaii to a high of 179 in New Jersey. Although academic research has been conducted at the county and metropolitan levels, no research has rigorously examined or identified the demographic and socioeconomic forces that explain state-level differences. This study presents an empirical model and the results of regression tests that help identify these forces and shed light on the role they play in explaining COVID-19 deaths. \n \nA stepwise regression model we tested exhibits a high degree of explanatory power. It suggests that two measures of density explain most of the state-level differences. Less significant variables included the poverty rate and racial/ethnic differences. We also found that variables relating to health, air travel, and government mandates were not significant in explaining COVID-19 deaths at the state level. \n \nThis study also examines the elasticities of those variables we found significant. We measured both average and constant elasticities to determine the relationship between changes in COVID-19 deaths and percentage changes in the relevant explanatory variables. In an analysis of residuals, we found that the unexplained variation was found to be related mainly to factors site-specific to individual states. \n \nUnlike the empirical results of several academic studies, our model found that the density of a state is the most important factor explaining COVID-19 deaths. The role that density plays in the transmission of COVID-19 has important policy implications in responding to the challenges posed by the coronavirus and future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":368984,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Other Specific Diseases or Therapies (Sub-Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEN: Other Specific Diseases or Therapies (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3731803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

COVID-19 death rates per 100,000 vary widely across the nation. As of September 1, 2020, they range from a low of 4 in Hawaii to a high of 179 in New Jersey. Although academic research has been conducted at the county and metropolitan levels, no research has rigorously examined or identified the demographic and socioeconomic forces that explain state-level differences. This study presents an empirical model and the results of regression tests that help identify these forces and shed light on the role they play in explaining COVID-19 deaths. A stepwise regression model we tested exhibits a high degree of explanatory power. It suggests that two measures of density explain most of the state-level differences. Less significant variables included the poverty rate and racial/ethnic differences. We also found that variables relating to health, air travel, and government mandates were not significant in explaining COVID-19 deaths at the state level. This study also examines the elasticities of those variables we found significant. We measured both average and constant elasticities to determine the relationship between changes in COVID-19 deaths and percentage changes in the relevant explanatory variables. In an analysis of residuals, we found that the unexplained variation was found to be related mainly to factors site-specific to individual states. Unlike the empirical results of several academic studies, our model found that the density of a state is the most important factor explaining COVID-19 deaths. The role that density plays in the transmission of COVID-19 has important policy implications in responding to the challenges posed by the coronavirus and future pandemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个解释全州COVID-19死亡率差异的模型
全国各地每10万人的新冠肺炎死亡率差异很大。截至2020年9月1日,它们的范围从夏威夷的最低4到新泽西州的最高179。虽然学术研究已经在县和城市层面进行,但没有研究严格检查或确定解释州一级差异的人口和社会经济力量。本研究提出了一个经验模型和回归测试的结果,有助于确定这些力量,并阐明它们在解释COVID-19死亡中所起的作用。我们检验的逐步回归模型显示出高度的解释力。该研究表明,两种密度测量方法可以解释大部分州级差异。不太重要的变量包括贫困率和种族/民族差异。我们还发现,与健康、航空旅行和政府授权相关的变量在解释州一级的COVID-19死亡人数方面并不重要。本研究还考察了这些变量的弹性,我们发现显著。我们测量了平均弹性和恒定弹性,以确定COVID-19死亡人数变化与相关解释变量百分比变化之间的关系。在残差分析中,我们发现无法解释的变异主要与个别州特定地点的因素有关。与几项学术研究的实证结果不同,我们的模型发现,一个州的密度是解释COVID-19死亡的最重要因素。人口密度在COVID-19传播中的作用对应对冠状病毒和未来大流行带来的挑战具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disentangling COVID-19, Economic Mobility, and Containment Policy Shocks A Model to Explain Statewide Differences in COVID-19 Death Rates Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic, Economic Consequences and Strategies for Ameliorting Macroeconomic Shocks in Nigeria’s Economy Modelling the Global Prevalence of COVID-19: An Econometric Approach Changes in Consumption amid COVID-19: Zip-Code Level Evidence from the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1