Corruption Risks in the Field of Public-Legal Protection of Animals: Case of Ukraine

Tetyana Kolomoyets, O. Makarenkov
{"title":"Corruption Risks in the Field of Public-Legal Protection of Animals: Case of Ukraine","authors":"Tetyana Kolomoyets, O. Makarenkov","doi":"10.17951/PPA.2018.1109-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the corruption risks in the field of exercising the powers of public-legal protection of animals. It is proved that such risks represent a system of spiritual, cultural, legal, organizational, economic, political and other factors that enable and/or encourage officials of public administration bodies to commit corruption offenses while exercising their authority in the field of animal protection. The essence of these factors is outlined, the specifics of which are determined by the nature of the subject of legal protection, the content and subjects of the implementation of public authority powers, the hierarchical level of their implementation. Wild and domestic (pets and homeless) animals in Ukraine are protected by the structures of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the state service of Ukraine for Food safety and Consumer Protection, the state Forestry Agency of Ukraine and the state Fisheries Industry Agency of Ukraine, as well as local public authorities and community groups. Corruption risks are specified on examples of these bodies, including those that make use of their discretionary powers or those which are not granted adequate powers. It has been found that these risks are also due to structural deficiencies, a low level of legal culture among officials and their socioeconomic and/or legal insecurity.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/PPA.2018.1109-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the corruption risks in the field of exercising the powers of public-legal protection of animals. It is proved that such risks represent a system of spiritual, cultural, legal, organizational, economic, political and other factors that enable and/or encourage officials of public administration bodies to commit corruption offenses while exercising their authority in the field of animal protection. The essence of these factors is outlined, the specifics of which are determined by the nature of the subject of legal protection, the content and subjects of the implementation of public authority powers, the hierarchical level of their implementation. Wild and domestic (pets and homeless) animals in Ukraine are protected by the structures of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the state service of Ukraine for Food safety and Consumer Protection, the state Forestry Agency of Ukraine and the state Fisheries Industry Agency of Ukraine, as well as local public authorities and community groups. Corruption risks are specified on examples of these bodies, including those that make use of their discretionary powers or those which are not granted adequate powers. It has been found that these risks are also due to structural deficiencies, a low level of legal culture among officials and their socioeconomic and/or legal insecurity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动物公法保护领域的腐败风险:以乌克兰为例
本文论述了动物公法保护权力行使中存在的腐败风险。事实证明,这种风险是一种精神、文化、法律、组织、经济、政治和其他因素构成的系统,使公共行政机构的官员在行使其在动物保护领域的权力时能够和/或鼓励腐败犯罪。概述了这些因素的本质,具体取决于法律保护主体的性质、公权力权力实施的内容和主体、权力实施的层次层次。乌克兰的野生动物和家养动物(宠物和流浪动物)受到乌克兰生态和自然资源部、乌克兰食品安全和消费者保护国家服务机构、乌克兰国家林业局和乌克兰国家渔业局以及地方公共当局和社区团体的保护。在这些机构的例子中,包括那些使用其自由裁量权或没有获得足够权力的机构,列出了腐败风险。研究发现,这些风险也是由于结构性缺陷、官员的法律文化水平较低以及他们的社会经济和/或法律不安全造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statutory Regulations on the Financial Economy of the National Bar of Attorneys-at-Law – Characteristics and Proposal for Classification Some Remarks on the Origin of Substantive Administrative Law in Western Europe Constitutional Principles of Electoral Law in Local Government Elections in Poland and European Solutions – Contribution to the Discussion The Right to a Public Trial in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights Collecting Information from the Public Sector vs. the Economic Development of the Private Sector: Practical Analysis of the Issues, de lege ferenda Postulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1