The Right to a Public Trial in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights

Dorota Pawlicka
{"title":"The Right to a Public Trial in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"Dorota Pawlicka","doi":"10.17951/ppa.2022.5.91-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to discuss the right to public trial before Polish administrative court in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, taking into account the legal solutions introduced during the pandemic, such as the Act of 2 March 2020 on special solutions connected with preventing, counteracting and combating COVID-19, other infectious diseases and crisis situations caused by them, the relation of the provisions of this legal act to the provisions of the Act of 30 August 2002 – Law on proceedings before administrative courts, the jurisprudence of administrative courts, the standpoint of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the right to a public hearing, as well as the views of the doctrine. The considerations showed that despite the restriction of the right to open examination of an administrative court case and despite the inevitable imperfections, the introduced regulations regarding remote hearings and referral of cases to classified hearings enabled the efficient functioning of the administrative judiciary during the pandemic. The article is dominated by the formal-dogmatic method. An analysis of the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights is also an important element.","PeriodicalId":298732,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Prawa Administracyjnego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2022.5.91-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to discuss the right to public trial before Polish administrative court in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, taking into account the legal solutions introduced during the pandemic, such as the Act of 2 March 2020 on special solutions connected with preventing, counteracting and combating COVID-19, other infectious diseases and crisis situations caused by them, the relation of the provisions of this legal act to the provisions of the Act of 30 August 2002 – Law on proceedings before administrative courts, the jurisprudence of administrative courts, the standpoint of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the right to a public hearing, as well as the views of the doctrine. The considerations showed that despite the restriction of the right to open examination of an administrative court case and despite the inevitable imperfections, the introduced regulations regarding remote hearings and referral of cases to classified hearings enabled the efficient functioning of the administrative judiciary during the pandemic. The article is dominated by the formal-dogmatic method. An analysis of the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights is also an important element.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最高行政法院和欧洲人权法院判例中的 COVID-19 大流行病背景下的公开审判权
本文旨在讨论在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下波兰行政法院的公开审判权,同时考虑到该大流行期间引入的法律解决方 案,如 2020 年 3 月 2 日关于预防、抵制和抗击 COVID-19、其他传染病及其引发的危机局势的特别解决方案的法案、该法案的规定与 2002 年 8 月 30 日《行政法院诉讼法》的规定、行政法院的判例、欧洲人权 法院在公开听证权方面的立场以及理论观点之间的关系。研究结果表明,尽管行政法院案件的公开审理权受到限制,尽管存在不可避免的不完善之处,但引入的关于远程听证和将案件移交分类听证的规定使行政司法机构在大流行病期间得以有效运作。本文主要采用了形式-教条主义方法。对最高行政法院和欧洲人权法院判例法的分析也是一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statutory Regulations on the Financial Economy of the National Bar of Attorneys-at-Law – Characteristics and Proposal for Classification Some Remarks on the Origin of Substantive Administrative Law in Western Europe Constitutional Principles of Electoral Law in Local Government Elections in Poland and European Solutions – Contribution to the Discussion The Right to a Public Trial in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court and the European Court of Human Rights Collecting Information from the Public Sector vs. the Economic Development of the Private Sector: Practical Analysis of the Issues, de lege ferenda Postulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1