Examining organizational health practices among universities in the central region of Uganda

Miiro Farooq, A. Othman, M. Nordin, M. Ibrahim
{"title":"Examining organizational health practices among universities in the central region of Uganda","authors":"Miiro Farooq, A. Othman, M. Nordin, M. Ibrahim","doi":"10.12775/JPM.2017.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study gives insights on the organizational health practices applied in Ugandan universities of the central region. The paper examined four subdimensions of the construct through the use of the data obtained from eight hundred twenty (N=820) randomly selected sample of volunteers from the six universities that have been in existence for the last fifteen (15) years. The data were gathered using a 25- items adopted and adapted from the previous studies reviewed, a Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree  (1-5) was used based on by Keller and Price conception of the construct. Confirmatory Factor analysis a component of structural equation modelling was employed to analyze the four subdimensions of the construct organizational health. The research findings of the empirical cross section survey reflected that there is a relationship between the four factor subdimensions; culture and climate, control and coordination, innovation/invention and accountability even though they are all distinct in nature. Meanwhile, accountability as one of the construct was eliminated from the results in figure 2 due to lower scores in the average variance explained (AVE). The results further exhibited that the four subdimensions of organizational health are reliable and valid measurements of the construct. The data generated was deemed appropriate for the study since structure equation modelling requires a big sample, and fitted the model due to the fact that all the parameter estimates were met. Lastly, the data was analysed through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and the study findings generated are an extension of the previous study findings since there was no similar study done in Uganda especially on higher education using this methodology. The study has greater implications to managers towards improvement of university staff performance and institutional transformation.","PeriodicalId":103376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2017.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study gives insights on the organizational health practices applied in Ugandan universities of the central region. The paper examined four subdimensions of the construct through the use of the data obtained from eight hundred twenty (N=820) randomly selected sample of volunteers from the six universities that have been in existence for the last fifteen (15) years. The data were gathered using a 25- items adopted and adapted from the previous studies reviewed, a Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree  (1-5) was used based on by Keller and Price conception of the construct. Confirmatory Factor analysis a component of structural equation modelling was employed to analyze the four subdimensions of the construct organizational health. The research findings of the empirical cross section survey reflected that there is a relationship between the four factor subdimensions; culture and climate, control and coordination, innovation/invention and accountability even though they are all distinct in nature. Meanwhile, accountability as one of the construct was eliminated from the results in figure 2 due to lower scores in the average variance explained (AVE). The results further exhibited that the four subdimensions of organizational health are reliable and valid measurements of the construct. The data generated was deemed appropriate for the study since structure equation modelling requires a big sample, and fitted the model due to the fact that all the parameter estimates were met. Lastly, the data was analysed through the use of confirmatory factor analysis and the study findings generated are an extension of the previous study findings since there was no similar study done in Uganda especially on higher education using this methodology. The study has greater implications to managers towards improvement of university staff performance and institutional transformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审查乌干达中部地区各大学的组织卫生做法
本研究对乌干达中部地区大学中应用的组织卫生实践提出了见解。本文通过使用从过去十五(15)年来存在的六所大学中随机选择的820 (N=820)名志愿者样本中获得的数据,检查了该结构的四个子维度。数据收集使用25个项目,采用并改编自以前的研究回顾,李克特量表范围从强烈不同意到强烈同意(1-5)是基于凯勒和价格的概念结构。采用结构方程模型中的验证性因子分析对构建组织健康的四个子维度进行分析。实证截面调查的研究结果表明,四个因子子维度之间存在一定的关系;文化和气候,控制和协调,创新/发明和责任,尽管它们在本质上都是不同的。同时,由于平均方差解释(AVE)得分较低,作为结构之一的问责制从图2的结果中被消除。结果进一步表明,组织健康的四个子维度是可靠和有效的测量结构。由于结构方程建模需要大样本,因此生成的数据被认为适合研究,并且由于所有参数估计都得到满足,因此对模型进行了拟合。最后,通过使用验证性因素分析对数据进行了分析,所产生的研究结果是对以前研究结果的延伸,因为在乌干达没有使用这种方法进行类似的研究,特别是在高等教育方面。该研究对管理者提高大学员工绩效和制度转型具有更大的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Agile Management Of Sustainable Development - Circular Economy Testing The Relationship Between Trust And Positive Relationships Within A Top Management Team: A Second-Order Structural Equation Modeling Approach The amplification of the bullwhip effect in the electronics industry under the influence of panic buying The relations between dynamic capabilities and core competencies. The case study of Uzdrowisko Ciechocinek S.A. The Last Mile Concept for the Bydgoszcz Logistics Hub
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1