A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox

Anton N Didenko
{"title":"A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox","authors":"Anton N Didenko","doi":"10.53637/xcwh2963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 1 September 2020, Australia’s ‘enhanced regulatory sandbox’ (‘ERS’) finally became operational. The ERS replaced the previous FinTech sandbox established and operated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (‘ASIC’), which had existed since 2016 but attracted only seven participants. This research analyses how and why Australia’s sandbox framework – with its unique non-authorisation model of operation – has evolved until now and evaluates whether the new enhanced sandbox regime can help to achieve its stated objectives. This article shows that the current sandbox reform merely scrapes the surface of the many challenges underlying ASIC’s FinTech sandbox and argues that these challenges can only be adequately resolved by revising the chosen sandbox model and switching to an authorisation-based sandbox design.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53637/xcwh2963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On 1 September 2020, Australia’s ‘enhanced regulatory sandbox’ (‘ERS’) finally became operational. The ERS replaced the previous FinTech sandbox established and operated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (‘ASIC’), which had existed since 2016 but attracted only seven participants. This research analyses how and why Australia’s sandbox framework – with its unique non-authorisation model of operation – has evolved until now and evaluates whether the new enhanced sandbox regime can help to achieve its stated objectives. This article shows that the current sandbox reform merely scrapes the surface of the many challenges underlying ASIC’s FinTech sandbox and argues that these challenges can only be adequately resolved by revising the chosen sandbox model and switching to an authorisation-based sandbox design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚强化金融科技沙盒的更好模式
2020年9月1日,澳大利亚的“增强型监管沙盒”(ERS)终于开始运行。ERS取代了之前由澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)建立和运营的金融科技沙盒,该沙盒自2016年以来一直存在,但仅吸引了7个参与者。本研究分析了澳大利亚的沙盒框架(其独特的非授权操作模式)如何以及为什么发展到现在,并评估了新的增强沙盒制度是否有助于实现其既定目标。本文表明,当前的沙盒改革只是触及了ASIC金融科技沙盒背后的许多挑战的表面,并认为这些挑战只能通过修改所选择的沙盒模型并切换到基于授权的沙盒设计来充分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox The Impact of Foreign Slowdown on the U.S. Economy: An Open Economy DSGE Perspective Explaining the Limits of the WTO in Shaping the Rule of Law in China Economic Development through Migration - Facilitating Skilled Migration to China through the Belt and Road Initiative The Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs: Contributing to the Grotian Moment in Asia:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1