CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance

R. Banker, Nan Hu, P. Pavlou, Jerry N. Luftman
{"title":"CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance","authors":"R. Banker, Nan Hu, P. Pavlou, Jerry N. Luftman","doi":"10.2307/23044053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Almost 30 years after the introduction of the CIO position, the ideal CIO reporting structure (whether the CIO should report to the CEO or the CFO) is yet to be identified. There is an intuitive assumption among some proponents of IT that the CIO should always report to the CEO to promote the importance of IT and the CIO's clout in the firm, while some adversaries of IT call for a CIO-CFO reporting structure to keep a tab on IT spending. However, we challenge these two ad hoc prescriptions by arguing that neither CIO reporting structure is necessarily optimal, and that the CIO reporting structure should not be used to gauge the strategic role of IT in the firm. \n \nFirst, extending the strategy-structure paradigm, we propose that a firm's strategic positioning (differentiation or cost leadership) should be a primary determinant of its CIO reporting structure. We hypothesize that differentiators are more likely to have their CIO report to the CEO in order to pursue IT initiatives that help the firm's differentiation strategy. We also hypothesize that cost leaders are more likely to have their CIO report to the CFO to lead IT initiatives to facilitate the firm's cost leadership strategy. Second, extending the alignment if it view, we propose that firms that align their CIO reporting structure with their strategic positioning (specifically, differentiation with a CIO-CEO reporting structure and cost leadership with a CIO-CFO reporting structure) will have superior future performance. \n \nLongitudinal data from two periods (1990-1993 and 2006) support the proposed hypotheses, validating the relationship between a firm's strategic positioning and its CIO reporting structure, and also the positive impact of their alignment on firm performance. These results challenge the ad hoc prescriptions about the CIO reporting structure, demonstrating that a CIO-CEO reporting structure is only superior for differentiators and a CIO-CFO reporting structure is superior only for cost leaders. The CIO reporting structure must, therefore, be designed to align with the firm's strategic positioning, independent of whether IT plays a key strategic role in the firm.","PeriodicalId":423722,"journal":{"name":"Fox: Accounting (Topic)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"274","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fox: Accounting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/23044053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 274

Abstract

Almost 30 years after the introduction of the CIO position, the ideal CIO reporting structure (whether the CIO should report to the CEO or the CFO) is yet to be identified. There is an intuitive assumption among some proponents of IT that the CIO should always report to the CEO to promote the importance of IT and the CIO's clout in the firm, while some adversaries of IT call for a CIO-CFO reporting structure to keep a tab on IT spending. However, we challenge these two ad hoc prescriptions by arguing that neither CIO reporting structure is necessarily optimal, and that the CIO reporting structure should not be used to gauge the strategic role of IT in the firm. First, extending the strategy-structure paradigm, we propose that a firm's strategic positioning (differentiation or cost leadership) should be a primary determinant of its CIO reporting structure. We hypothesize that differentiators are more likely to have their CIO report to the CEO in order to pursue IT initiatives that help the firm's differentiation strategy. We also hypothesize that cost leaders are more likely to have their CIO report to the CFO to lead IT initiatives to facilitate the firm's cost leadership strategy. Second, extending the alignment if it view, we propose that firms that align their CIO reporting structure with their strategic positioning (specifically, differentiation with a CIO-CEO reporting structure and cost leadership with a CIO-CFO reporting structure) will have superior future performance. Longitudinal data from two periods (1990-1993 and 2006) support the proposed hypotheses, validating the relationship between a firm's strategic positioning and its CIO reporting structure, and also the positive impact of their alignment on firm performance. These results challenge the ad hoc prescriptions about the CIO reporting structure, demonstrating that a CIO-CEO reporting structure is only superior for differentiators and a CIO-CFO reporting structure is superior only for cost leaders. The CIO reporting structure must, therefore, be designed to align with the firm's strategic positioning, independent of whether IT plays a key strategic role in the firm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CIO报告结构、战略定位与公司绩效
在引入CIO职位近30年后,理想的CIO报告结构(CIO应该向CEO报告还是向CFO报告)尚未确定。IT的一些支持者有一个直观的假设,即CIO应该总是向CEO报告,以提高IT的重要性和CIO在公司中的影响力,而IT的一些反对者则要求CIO- cfo报告结构来记录IT支出。然而,我们质疑这两个特别的处方,认为CIO报告结构都不一定是最佳的,并且CIO报告结构不应该被用来衡量IT在公司中的战略作用。首先,扩展战略结构范式,我们提出公司的战略定位(差异化或成本领先)应该是其CIO报告结构的主要决定因素。我们假设差异化企业更有可能让他们的CIO向CEO报告,以追求有助于公司差异化战略的IT计划。我们还假设,成本领导者更有可能让他们的CIO向CFO报告,以领导IT计划,以促进公司的成本领先战略。其次,扩展一致性观点,我们建议将CIO报告结构与其战略定位(具体而言,差异化与CIO- ceo报告结构和成本领先与CIO- cfo报告结构)相结合的公司将具有更好的未来绩效。两个时期(1990-1993年和2006年)的纵向数据支持了提出的假设,验证了企业战略定位与其CIO报告结构之间的关系,以及它们的一致性对企业绩效的积极影响。这些结果挑战了关于CIO报告结构的特别处方,表明CIO- ceo报告结构仅对差异化者有利,CIO- cfo报告结构仅对成本领导者有利。因此,CIO报告结构的设计必须与公司的战略定位保持一致,而与IT是否在公司中扮演关键的战略角色无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revenue Recognition: A Brave New World Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts: Implications for Analyst Forecast Timing and Market Efficiency The Confounding Effect of Cost Stickiness on Conservatism Estimates Asymmetries in Cost-Volume-Profit Relation: Cost Stickiness and Conditional Conservatism CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1