Timing the impact of sanctions on trade

Mian Dai
{"title":"Timing the impact of sanctions on trade","authors":"Mian Dai","doi":"10.4337/9781839102721.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"February 19, 2021 Abstract We capitalize on the latest estimation methods in the empirical gravity literature and the development of a new dataset (the Global Sanctions Data Base, GSDB) to study the evolution, over time, of the effects of sanctions on international trade. Our analysis reveals that the contemporaneous effects of sanctions on trade are large, negative and statistically significant. Additionally, we obtain negative and significant anticipatory effects prior to the official imposition of sanctions, as well as negative and significant post-sanction effects, which disappear gradually approximately eight years after the lifting of sanctions. Our work generates several insights related to the estimation of the impact of sanctions on trade and unveils new avenues for future work. For example, we find the strength of the negative impact of sanctions to rise with the duration of the time that sanctions are in force. Moreover, our analysis of unilateral vs. multilateral and US vs. UN vs. EU sanctions suggests that unilateral sanctions and sanctions imposed by the US stand out as being most effective. A battery of sensitivity experiments confirms the robustness of our main findings and conclusions.","PeriodicalId":132516,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102721.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

February 19, 2021 Abstract We capitalize on the latest estimation methods in the empirical gravity literature and the development of a new dataset (the Global Sanctions Data Base, GSDB) to study the evolution, over time, of the effects of sanctions on international trade. Our analysis reveals that the contemporaneous effects of sanctions on trade are large, negative and statistically significant. Additionally, we obtain negative and significant anticipatory effects prior to the official imposition of sanctions, as well as negative and significant post-sanction effects, which disappear gradually approximately eight years after the lifting of sanctions. Our work generates several insights related to the estimation of the impact of sanctions on trade and unveils new avenues for future work. For example, we find the strength of the negative impact of sanctions to rise with the duration of the time that sanctions are in force. Moreover, our analysis of unilateral vs. multilateral and US vs. UN vs. EU sanctions suggests that unilateral sanctions and sanctions imposed by the US stand out as being most effective. A battery of sensitivity experiments confirms the robustness of our main findings and conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定制裁对贸易影响的时间
摘要本文利用实证重力文献中的最新估计方法,开发了一个新的数据集(全球制裁数据库,GSDB),研究制裁对国际贸易影响的演变。我们的分析表明,制裁对贸易的同期影响是巨大的、负面的和统计上显著的。此外,我们在正式实施制裁之前得到消极和重大的预期影响,以及在制裁后得到消极和重大的影响,这些影响在取消制裁大约8年后逐渐消失。我们的工作产生了与估计制裁对贸易的影响有关的若干见解,并为今后的工作开辟了新的途径。例如,我们发现制裁的负面影响的强度随着制裁生效时间的延长而增加。此外,我们对单边制裁与多边制裁、美国制裁与联合国制裁与欧盟制裁的分析表明,单边制裁和美国实施的制裁最为有效。一系列的灵敏度实验证实了我们的主要发现和结论的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade preference suspensions as economic sanctions Timing the impact of sanctions on trade Imposing sanctions versus posing in sanctioners’ clothes: the EU sanctions against Russia and the Russian counter-sanctions The impact of sanctions on the banking system: new evidence from Iran The internal opposition effect of international sanctions: insights from a qualitative comparative analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1