{"title":"Performance comparison of different vector control approaches for a synchronous reluctance motor drive","authors":"P. Ghosh, A. Das, G. Bhuvaneswari","doi":"10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comprehensive performance comparison has been made for different vector control methods in Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM). The vector control methods investigated are constant direct axis current control and constant current angle control. Different methods of constant current angle vector control included in this paper are MTPA (Maximum torque per ampere), MPFC (Maximum power factor control) and MTPF (Maximum torque per flux). The SynRM is driven by a current controlled PWM voltage source inverter controlled by a PI speed controller. All these methods have been modelled and simulated in Simulink/MATLAB environment, by keeping the PI controller parameters the same and a thorough comparison has been brought out. A very good performance is achieved for the above mentioned vector control methods and their performance parameters such as response time, torque ripple and peak stator current are being compared. The results obtained from the analysis will help in deciding which of the above vector control techniques can be employed in high performance drive applications such as electric vehicles, ship propulsion, traction, etc., when and under what conditions.","PeriodicalId":286358,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERA.2017.8343348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
In this paper, a comprehensive performance comparison has been made for different vector control methods in Synchronous Reluctance Motor (SynRM). The vector control methods investigated are constant direct axis current control and constant current angle control. Different methods of constant current angle vector control included in this paper are MTPA (Maximum torque per ampere), MPFC (Maximum power factor control) and MTPF (Maximum torque per flux). The SynRM is driven by a current controlled PWM voltage source inverter controlled by a PI speed controller. All these methods have been modelled and simulated in Simulink/MATLAB environment, by keeping the PI controller parameters the same and a thorough comparison has been brought out. A very good performance is achieved for the above mentioned vector control methods and their performance parameters such as response time, torque ripple and peak stator current are being compared. The results obtained from the analysis will help in deciding which of the above vector control techniques can be employed in high performance drive applications such as electric vehicles, ship propulsion, traction, etc., when and under what conditions.
本文对同步磁阻电动机的矢量控制方法进行了全面的性能比较。所研究的矢量控制方法有恒定直轴电流控制和恒定电流角控制。本文介绍的恒流角矢量控制方法有MTPA (Maximum torque per am培)、MPFC (Maximum power factor control)和MTPF (Maximum torque per flux)。SynRM由电流控制的PWM电压源逆变器驱动,由PI速度控制器控制。在保持PI控制器参数不变的情况下,在Simulink/MATLAB环境下对这些方法进行了建模和仿真,并进行了全面的比较。对上述矢量控制方法的响应时间、转矩纹波和定子电流峰值等性能参数进行了比较。从分析中获得的结果将有助于确定哪种上述矢量控制技术可以用于高性能驱动应用,如电动汽车、船舶推进、牵引等,以及何时和在何种条件下。