Coalition Governance: Unchartered Waters in South African Political Landscape

K. Makole, B. Ntshangase, S. Adewumi
{"title":"Coalition Governance: Unchartered Waters in South African Political Landscape","authors":"K. Makole, B. Ntshangase, S. Adewumi","doi":"10.21272/bel.6(4).23-37.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coalition governance in South Africa is adjudged as an opportunity for nation-building and social compact, which intends to jettison the apartheid legacy of racial and social separation. Coalition governance in South Africa quintessentially demonstrates a maturing nation-building project whereby political parties embrace a cohesive spirit for democratic governance and citizenship representation. However, the lack of consensus about a developmental posture to drive nation-building in South Africa put different political parties on antithetical dissimulations that undermine effective coalition governance in both national and local governmental spheres. An era of dominant party hegemony is approaching its final demise, which challenges political parties to build workable and collaborative consensus toward leading South Africa out of its current developmental stagnation. The study examines the challenges and opportunities of coalition governance in South Africa. The objective of the paper is to understand how coalition building can be a leverage for Nation building in the context of South African political structure. A qualitative study is undertaken by analyzing strategic and policy documents of political parties and journal articles to examine challenges and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. The thematic content analysis examines emerging patterns from primary and secondary documentary sources to generate relevant themes that influence and guide conceptualization, challenges, and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. Findings revealed that a major challenge for coalition governance in South Africa is political brinkmanship by political parties who negotiate in bad faith, demanding more concessions than votes garnered from election results, which demonstrates political immaturity. However, a positive aspect of coalition governance might be for parties to formalize binding coalition agreements that can serve as conflict management mechanisms that can compel parties to demonstrate reciprocal accountability during governance.","PeriodicalId":410560,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics and Leadership","volume":"11 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(4).23-37.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Coalition governance in South Africa is adjudged as an opportunity for nation-building and social compact, which intends to jettison the apartheid legacy of racial and social separation. Coalition governance in South Africa quintessentially demonstrates a maturing nation-building project whereby political parties embrace a cohesive spirit for democratic governance and citizenship representation. However, the lack of consensus about a developmental posture to drive nation-building in South Africa put different political parties on antithetical dissimulations that undermine effective coalition governance in both national and local governmental spheres. An era of dominant party hegemony is approaching its final demise, which challenges political parties to build workable and collaborative consensus toward leading South Africa out of its current developmental stagnation. The study examines the challenges and opportunities of coalition governance in South Africa. The objective of the paper is to understand how coalition building can be a leverage for Nation building in the context of South African political structure. A qualitative study is undertaken by analyzing strategic and policy documents of political parties and journal articles to examine challenges and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. The thematic content analysis examines emerging patterns from primary and secondary documentary sources to generate relevant themes that influence and guide conceptualization, challenges, and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. Findings revealed that a major challenge for coalition governance in South Africa is political brinkmanship by political parties who negotiate in bad faith, demanding more concessions than votes garnered from election results, which demonstrates political immaturity. However, a positive aspect of coalition governance might be for parties to formalize binding coalition agreements that can serve as conflict management mechanisms that can compel parties to demonstrate reciprocal accountability during governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合治理:南非政治版图中的未知水域
南非的联合治理被认为是国家建设和社会契约的一个机会,它旨在抛弃种族和社会分离的种族隔离遗产。南非的联合治理典型地展示了一个成熟的国家建设项目,各政党在民主治理和公民代表方面具有凝聚力精神。然而,在推动南非国家建设的发展态势方面缺乏共识,使不同的政党采取对立的伪装,从而破坏了国家和地方政府领域的有效联合治理。执政党霸权的时代正在接近最后的终结,这对各政党提出了挑战,要求它们建立可行的合作共识,以领导南非摆脱目前的发展停滞。该研究考察了南非联合治理的挑战和机遇。本文的目的是了解在南非政治结构的背景下,联盟建设如何成为国家建设的杠杆。通过分析各政党的战略和政策文件和期刊文章进行定性研究,以审查南非联合治理的挑战和机遇。专题内容分析考察了来自初级和次级文献来源的新模式,以产生影响和指导南非联合治理的概念化、挑战和机遇的相关主题。调查结果显示,南非联合政府面临的一个主要挑战是政党的政治边缘政策,他们在谈判中缺乏诚意,要求更多的让步,而不是从选举结果中获得的选票,这显示出政治上的不成熟。然而,联合治理的一个积极方面可能是各方将有约束力的联合协议正式化,这些协议可以作为冲突管理机制,迫使各方在治理期间表现出相互的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Overcome Ethical Dilemmas in an Organization: Paradox and Ethics of Freedom Can Help A Fair Investment Environment: The Impact of the Shadow Economy, the Harshness of the Courts Against Corrupt Officials, Tax Pressure and Restrictions on Business Cost of Quality Management: Encouraging Business Leaders to Manage and Invest in Quality Enhancement Exploring Leadership and Other Influential Dimensions When Assessing Online Learning Modules Within Higher Education Institutions: Insights From Flow Theory and Two-Factor Principles Corruption and Economic Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence From Dynamic Threshold Panel Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1