APRENDIZAGEM NA INFÂNCIA DIÁLOGOS ENTRE OS REFERENCIAIS CURRICULARES NACIONAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL, AS DIRETRIZES CURRICULARES NACIONAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR

Aline Juliana Oja Persicheto, Marcia Cristina Argenti Perez
{"title":"APRENDIZAGEM NA INFÂNCIA DIÁLOGOS ENTRE OS REFERENCIAIS CURRICULARES NACIONAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL, AS DIRETRIZES CURRICULARES NACIONAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E A BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR","authors":"Aline Juliana Oja Persicheto, Marcia Cristina Argenti Perez","doi":"10.29327/210932.8.1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical process of building the identity of Early Childhood Education has developed from tensions that result in different positions on the purposes of this school stage. The curricular organization has been constituted in a sinuous way, in face of the constant challenges to conceive a proposal that meets the specificities of children’s learning and development. The present text intends to verify advances and gaps present in the official curricular documents, such as RCNEI, DCNEI and BNCC, to promote conditions that allow the construction of an integrative vision on aspects that favor children’s learning and development. This is a bibliographic research based on studies on childhood and analysis of works that addressed discussions on the curricular proposals for Early Childhood Education. Even with the identified gaps, the documents analyzed represent the movement of educational policies and advances can be identified in the construction of the identity of Early Childhood Education.","PeriodicalId":285093,"journal":{"name":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","volume":"355 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/210932.8.1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historical process of building the identity of Early Childhood Education has developed from tensions that result in different positions on the purposes of this school stage. The curricular organization has been constituted in a sinuous way, in face of the constant challenges to conceive a proposal that meets the specificities of children’s learning and development. The present text intends to verify advances and gaps present in the official curricular documents, such as RCNEI, DCNEI and BNCC, to promote conditions that allow the construction of an integrative vision on aspects that favor children’s learning and development. This is a bibliographic research based on studies on childhood and analysis of works that addressed discussions on the curricular proposals for Early Childhood Education. Even with the identified gaps, the documents analyzed represent the movement of educational policies and advances can be identified in the construction of the identity of Early Childhood Education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童学习:国家幼儿教育课程框架、国家幼儿教育课程指南和国家共同课程基础之间的对话
建立幼儿教育身份的历史过程是由紧张局势发展而来的,这种紧张局势导致了对这一学校阶段目的的不同立场。课程组织以一种曲折的方式构成,面对不断的挑战,构思一个符合儿童学习和发展特殊性的方案。本文旨在验证官方课程文件(如RCNEI、DCNEI和BNCC)中的进步和差距,以促进在有利于儿童学习和发展的方面建立综合愿景的条件。这是一项基于儿童研究和对早期儿童教育课程建议讨论的作品分析的书目研究。即使有确定的差距,所分析的文件也代表了教育政策的运动和进步,可以在幼儿教育身份的建构中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yolanda Arroyo Pizarro epistemologias negras caribenhas Eu aceno, tu grunhes, ele traceja a linguagem e o tempo Um papel para os indígenas esboços do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro impressos em O Guarani Breve notícia de um processo editorial baseado nos cadernos de campo dos Agentes Agroflorestais Indígenas do Acre O índio e o seringueiro no (dis) curso de O Juruá
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1