EUROPEAN MODELS OF SPORT: GOVERNANCE, ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND SPORTS POLICY IN THE EU

I. Henry
{"title":"EUROPEAN MODELS OF SPORT: GOVERNANCE, ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE AND SPORTS POLICY IN THE EU","authors":"I. Henry","doi":"10.15057/18054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses organisational aspects of European sports policy primarily at the nation-state level, but also in respect of the European Union. In particular it seeks to identify and evaluate the nature and structure of policy systems and the changes such systems might be undergoing within the EU. Although there has been a relatively recent growth in comparative analysis of elite policy systems (Bosscher Veerle De, Bingham Jerry, & Simon, 2007; Green & Houlihan, 2005; Houlihan, Bergsgard, Mangset, Nødland, & Rommetvedt, 2007), more general reviews of sport policy have tended to be limited to collections of single nation studies (Chalip, Johnson, & Stachura, 1996) or to address transnational and global policy influences (Henry & Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, 2007). While material with a European focus does exist, this has related to leisure policy rather than sport (Bramham, Henry, Mommaas, & van der Poel, 1993) or to the European Union per se (Henry, 2008) rather than to European Member Statesʼ sports policies. One of the few sources to address sports policy, from mass to elite, and with a distinctively comparative approach and a focus on the European Union is the report of Jean Camy and his colleagues in the VOCASPORT report (VOCASPORT Research Group, 2004) commissioned by the Sports Unit of the European Commission. In a concise 10 page section of the report the authors seek to outline a typology of sports policy systems in the EU. This chapter aims to extend the VOCASPORT analysis by : exploring the nature of the overall policy goals promoted by, or consistent with, each of the ideal type configurations; evaluating the nature and emphasis of the philosophy of service delivery in each configuration; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each of the four configurations; and explaining the tensions within national systems that are reflected in shifts from one configuration towards another. The concluding section of the chapter will seek to outline the relationship between the approach to sports policy implicit in the European Commissionʼs White paper on Sport (European Commission, 2007) and the approaches evident in the VOCASPORT typology.","PeriodicalId":265291,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of arts and sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of arts and sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/18054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

This paper addresses organisational aspects of European sports policy primarily at the nation-state level, but also in respect of the European Union. In particular it seeks to identify and evaluate the nature and structure of policy systems and the changes such systems might be undergoing within the EU. Although there has been a relatively recent growth in comparative analysis of elite policy systems (Bosscher Veerle De, Bingham Jerry, & Simon, 2007; Green & Houlihan, 2005; Houlihan, Bergsgard, Mangset, Nødland, & Rommetvedt, 2007), more general reviews of sport policy have tended to be limited to collections of single nation studies (Chalip, Johnson, & Stachura, 1996) or to address transnational and global policy influences (Henry & Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy, 2007). While material with a European focus does exist, this has related to leisure policy rather than sport (Bramham, Henry, Mommaas, & van der Poel, 1993) or to the European Union per se (Henry, 2008) rather than to European Member Statesʼ sports policies. One of the few sources to address sports policy, from mass to elite, and with a distinctively comparative approach and a focus on the European Union is the report of Jean Camy and his colleagues in the VOCASPORT report (VOCASPORT Research Group, 2004) commissioned by the Sports Unit of the European Commission. In a concise 10 page section of the report the authors seek to outline a typology of sports policy systems in the EU. This chapter aims to extend the VOCASPORT analysis by : exploring the nature of the overall policy goals promoted by, or consistent with, each of the ideal type configurations; evaluating the nature and emphasis of the philosophy of service delivery in each configuration; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each of the four configurations; and explaining the tensions within national systems that are reflected in shifts from one configuration towards another. The concluding section of the chapter will seek to outline the relationship between the approach to sports policy implicit in the European Commissionʼs White paper on Sport (European Commission, 2007) and the approaches evident in the VOCASPORT typology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲体育模式:欧盟的治理、组织变革和体育政策
本文主要在民族国家层面讨论欧洲体育政策的组织方面,但也涉及欧盟。它尤其力求查明和评价政策制度的性质和结构以及这些制度在欧盟内部可能发生的变化。尽管最近精英政策体系的比较分析有所增长(Bosscher Veerle De, Bingham Jerry, & Simon, 2007;Green & Houlihan, 2005;Houlihan, Bergsgard, Mangset, Nødland, & Rommetvedt, 2007),对体育政策的更一般的评论往往局限于单个国家研究的集合(Chalip, Johnson, & Stachura, 1996)或解决跨国和全球政策影响(Henry和体育与休闲政策研究所,2007)。虽然以欧洲为重点的材料确实存在,但这与休闲政策而不是体育(Bramham, Henry, Mommaas, & van der Poel, 1993)或欧盟本身(Henry, 2008)而不是欧洲成员国的体育政策有关。Jean Camy和他的同事在由欧盟委员会体育部门委托的VOCASPORT报告(VOCASPORT研究小组,2004年)中提出了从大众到精英的体育政策,并采用了独特的比较方法和对欧盟的关注,这是为数不多的几个来源之一。在这份报告中,作者用10页的篇幅简明扼要地概述了欧盟体育政策体系的类型学。本章旨在通过以下方式扩展VOCASPORT分析:探讨由每种理想类型配置推动或与之一致的总体政策目标的性质;评估每个配置中服务提供理念的性质和重点;确定四种配置的优缺点;并解释了从一种结构向另一种结构转变所反映的国家体系内部的紧张关系。本章的最后部分将试图概述欧盟委员会体育白皮书(欧盟委员会,2007年)中隐含的体育政策方法与VOCASPORT类型学中明显的方法之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Translating 'Islam' into Japanese - Concerning the Japanese Version of the Qur'an and Its Translation Strategy Weber's Konzertstück op. 79, or Programming Piano Concertos in Early-nineteenth Century Concerts (The Birth of the Piano Concerto, Chapter 5) Von einem jungen Japaner: Toshio Morikawa - Thomas Mann Briefwechsel (1) The Transition of the Monk's Dance (Sŭngmu) from Ritual Dance to Folk Art in Modern Korea to 1945 WELCHEN EINFLUSS HAT DAS LERNEN FÜR DIE UNIVERSITÄREN AUFNAHMEPRÜFUNGEN IN JAPAN AUF DIE LERNENDEN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1