Immigrant social inclusion in Europe: A descriptive investigation

Europa XXI Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.7163/eu21.2019.37.7
Dionyssis Balourdos, M. Petraki
{"title":"Immigrant social inclusion in Europe: A descriptive investigation","authors":"Dionyssis Balourdos, M. Petraki","doi":"10.7163/eu21.2019.37.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper represents an empirical investigation into the risk of poverty or social exclusion facing immigrants across Europe. The methodological approach is based on the set of ‘Zaragoza indicators’, in the domain of social inclusion, together with some proposed additional ones: income distribution and monetary poverty, material deprivation, in-work poverty, child poverty and risk of poverty or social exclusion. The main research question concerns whether immigrants/third-country nationals and nationals constitute two rather distinct groups in terms of exposure to poverty or social exclusion. Mainly using data from the EU-SILC Survey, we find that third-country nationals are severely disadvantaged in most countries, and are occasionally exposed to risks multiple times higher than nationals. There are European countries with similar immigrant populations in which these immigrants experience less favorable outcomes compared to other populations in other countries. Comparative analysis allows us to test the significance of different welfare systems in protecting vulnerable groups such as immigrants, using Eurostat statistics and the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX). In a cross-country analysis, taking demographic and macro-economic differences into account, results show that the impact of social expenditure on poverty is not significant when it comes to protecting third-country nationals.","PeriodicalId":120225,"journal":{"name":"Europa XXI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europa XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7163/eu21.2019.37.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper represents an empirical investigation into the risk of poverty or social exclusion facing immigrants across Europe. The methodological approach is based on the set of ‘Zaragoza indicators’, in the domain of social inclusion, together with some proposed additional ones: income distribution and monetary poverty, material deprivation, in-work poverty, child poverty and risk of poverty or social exclusion. The main research question concerns whether immigrants/third-country nationals and nationals constitute two rather distinct groups in terms of exposure to poverty or social exclusion. Mainly using data from the EU-SILC Survey, we find that third-country nationals are severely disadvantaged in most countries, and are occasionally exposed to risks multiple times higher than nationals. There are European countries with similar immigrant populations in which these immigrants experience less favorable outcomes compared to other populations in other countries. Comparative analysis allows us to test the significance of different welfare systems in protecting vulnerable groups such as immigrants, using Eurostat statistics and the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX). In a cross-country analysis, taking demographic and macro-economic differences into account, results show that the impact of social expenditure on poverty is not significant when it comes to protecting third-country nationals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲移民社会包容:一项描述性调查
本文对欧洲移民面临的贫困或社会排斥风险进行了实证调查。方法方法基于社会包容领域的一套“萨拉戈萨指标”,以及一些拟议的附加指标:收入分配和货币贫困、物质匮乏、在职贫困、儿童贫困以及贫困或社会排斥风险。主要的研究问题涉及移民/第三国国民和本国国民在遭受贫穷或社会排斥方面是否构成两个相当不同的群体。主要使用欧盟- silc调查的数据,我们发现第三国国民在大多数国家处于严重不利地位,并且偶尔面临比本国国民高出数倍的风险。有些欧洲国家的移民人口与其他国家相似,但与其他国家的其他人口相比,这些移民经历的结果不太好。通过比较分析,我们可以利用欧盟统计局的统计数据和移民融合政策指数(MIPEX)来检验不同福利制度在保护移民等弱势群体方面的重要性。在一项考虑到人口和宏观经济差异的跨国分析中,结果表明,在保护第三国国民方面,社会支出对贫困的影响并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EU macro-regional strategies for the Baltic Sea Region after 2020. A nutshell of beauty and possibilities Sustainable transport for border areas in the European Union Editorial: The transformation of post-industrial areas and territorial aspects of Just Transition Fund implementation Editorial: Sea dragons A review of the challenges and strategies of delivering services of general interest in European rural areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1