Accuracy and Size Trade-off of a Cartesian Genetic Programming Flow for Logic Optimization

A. Berndt, I. S. Campos, B. Lima, M. Grellert, J. T. Carvalho, C. Meinhardt, B. A. de Abreu
{"title":"Accuracy and Size Trade-off of a Cartesian Genetic Programming Flow for Logic Optimization","authors":"A. Berndt, I. S. Campos, B. Lima, M. Grellert, J. T. Carvalho, C. Meinhardt, B. A. de Abreu","doi":"10.1109/SBCCI53441.2021.9529968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logic synthesis tools face tough challenges when providing algorithms for synthesizing circuits with increased inputs and complexity. Traditional approaches for logic synthesis have been in the spotlight so far. However, due to advances in machine learning and their high performance in solving specific problems, such algorithms appear as an attractive option to improve electronic design tools. In our work, we explore Cartesian Genetic Programming for logic optimization of exact or approximate combinational circuits. The proposed CGP flow receives input from the circuit description in the format of AND-Inverter Graphs and its expected behavior as a truth-table. The CGP may improve solutions found by other techniques used for bootstrapping the evolutionary process or initialize the search from random (unbiased) individuals seeking optimal circuits. We propose two different evaluation methods for the CGP: to minimize the number of AIG nodes or optimize the circuit accuracy. We obtain at least 22.6% superior results when considering the ratio between accuracy and size for the benchmarks used, compared with the teams from the IWLS 2020 contest that obtained the best accuracy and size results. It is noteworthy that any logic synthesis approach based on AIGs can easily incorporate the proposed flow. The results obtained show that their usage may achieve improved logic circuits.","PeriodicalId":270661,"journal":{"name":"2021 34th SBC/SBMicro/IEEE/ACM Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design (SBCCI)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 34th SBC/SBMicro/IEEE/ACM Symposium on Integrated Circuits and Systems Design (SBCCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBCCI53441.2021.9529968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Logic synthesis tools face tough challenges when providing algorithms for synthesizing circuits with increased inputs and complexity. Traditional approaches for logic synthesis have been in the spotlight so far. However, due to advances in machine learning and their high performance in solving specific problems, such algorithms appear as an attractive option to improve electronic design tools. In our work, we explore Cartesian Genetic Programming for logic optimization of exact or approximate combinational circuits. The proposed CGP flow receives input from the circuit description in the format of AND-Inverter Graphs and its expected behavior as a truth-table. The CGP may improve solutions found by other techniques used for bootstrapping the evolutionary process or initialize the search from random (unbiased) individuals seeking optimal circuits. We propose two different evaluation methods for the CGP: to minimize the number of AIG nodes or optimize the circuit accuracy. We obtain at least 22.6% superior results when considering the ratio between accuracy and size for the benchmarks used, compared with the teams from the IWLS 2020 contest that obtained the best accuracy and size results. It is noteworthy that any logic synthesis approach based on AIGs can easily incorporate the proposed flow. The results obtained show that their usage may achieve improved logic circuits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逻辑优化中笛卡尔遗传规划流的精度和尺寸权衡
逻辑合成工具在为输入和复杂性增加的合成电路提供算法时面临着严峻的挑战。到目前为止,传统的逻辑综合方法一直是人们关注的焦点。然而,由于机器学习的进步及其在解决特定问题方面的高性能,这种算法似乎是改进电子设计工具的一个有吸引力的选择。在我们的工作中,我们探索笛卡尔遗传规划用于精确或近似组合电路的逻辑优化。所提出的CGP流以and -逆变器图的格式接收电路描述的输入,并以真值表的形式接收其预期行为。CGP可以改进其他用于自引导进化过程的技术所发现的解决方案,或者初始化从随机(无偏)个体寻找最优电路的搜索。我们提出了两种不同的CGP评估方法:最小化AIG节点数量或优化电路精度。与IWLS 2020竞赛中获得最佳准确性和尺寸结果的团队相比,在考虑所使用基准的准确性和尺寸之间的比率时,我们获得了至少22.6%的优势。值得注意的是,任何基于ai的逻辑合成方法都可以很容易地合并提议的流。结果表明,它们的使用可以实现改进的逻辑电路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FLoPAD-GRU: A Flexible, Low Power, Accelerated DSP for Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network A Robust and Power-Efficient Power Line Interference Canceling VLSI Design Exploring Approximate Computing and Near- Threshold Operation to Design Energy -efficient Multipliers Multifunctional auricular vagus nerve stimulator for closed-loop application Injection-Locked Ring Oscillator based Phase-Lacked-Loop for 1.6 Gbps Clock Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1