Diego Gatica, Francisco Ponce, René Noël, H. Astudillo
{"title":"Characterizing Architectural Evaluations and Identifying Quality Attributes addressed in Systems-of-Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study","authors":"Diego Gatica, Francisco Ponce, René Noël, H. Astudillo","doi":"10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System-of-Systems (SoS) are composed by heterogeneous constituent systems that are autonomous, independently managed and operated, and geographically distributed. Architectural evaluation is a key activity of all systems design, construction and operation; unfortunately, the interrelationships among SoS constituent systems and quality attributes (QA) make hard to evaluate SoS. Several evaluation techniques have been proposed, but this corpus of knowledge has not yet been organized for easy access. This article describes the design, execution and results of a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) of architectural evaluation proposals, focusing on the QA’s they address and the techniques they use. The SLM yield 1675 articles, of which 22 were selected for detailed analysis; most of them take a quantitative perspective (82%) and the rest are hybrid quantitative/qualitative (18%); most proposals offer no empirical validation at all (64%); and the most addressed QA’s are performance and robustness.","PeriodicalId":235495,"journal":{"name":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
System-of-Systems (SoS) are composed by heterogeneous constituent systems that are autonomous, independently managed and operated, and geographically distributed. Architectural evaluation is a key activity of all systems design, construction and operation; unfortunately, the interrelationships among SoS constituent systems and quality attributes (QA) make hard to evaluate SoS. Several evaluation techniques have been proposed, but this corpus of knowledge has not yet been organized for easy access. This article describes the design, execution and results of a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) of architectural evaluation proposals, focusing on the QA’s they address and the techniques they use. The SLM yield 1675 articles, of which 22 were selected for detailed analysis; most of them take a quantitative perspective (82%) and the rest are hybrid quantitative/qualitative (18%); most proposals offer no empirical validation at all (64%); and the most addressed QA’s are performance and robustness.
系统的系统(so)由异构的组成系统组成,这些系统是自治的、独立管理和操作的,并且在地理上是分布的。架构评估是所有系统设计、建造和运行的关键活动;不幸的是,SoS组成系统和质量属性(QA)之间的相互关系使SoS难以评估。已经提出了几种评价技术,但这些知识的语料库尚未组织起来以便于获取。本文描述了体系结构评估建议的系统文献映射(system Literature Mapping, SLM)的设计、执行和结果,重点关注它们所处理的QA问题和它们所使用的技术。SLM共产生1675篇文章,其中选取22篇进行详细分析;其中大多数采用定量视角(82%),其余为定量/定性混合视角(18%);大多数提案根本没有提供经验验证(64%);最重要的QA问题是性能和健壮性。