Linking Social and Emotional Learning Standards to the Social Emotional Competency Assessment (SECA)

ERN: National Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3890967
R. Gordon, Marisa K Crowder, Laura Davidson, C. Domitrovich
{"title":"Linking Social and Emotional Learning Standards to the Social Emotional Competency Assessment (SECA)","authors":"R. Gordon, Marisa K Crowder, Laura Davidson, C. Domitrovich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3890967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School districts across the United States are developing systemic, district-wide approaches to support students’ social and emotional learning (SEL), due to the increasingly recognized role that students’ social-emotional competencies (SECs) play in their academic success (Domitrovich et al., 2017; Kendziora & Osher, 2016; Mahoney et al., 2017). Such initiatives have increased the need for cost-effective measures of students’ SECs that are feasible for large-scale use, embedded in scholarly literature, and aligned to local needs (Stecher & Hamilton, 2014). This brief describes evidence for one such measure, the Social-Emotional Competency Assessment (SECA), which is a self-report assessment of students’ SECs that can be used from late elementary to high school (Crowder et al., 2018; Davidson et al., 2018; Schamberg et al., 2017). The measure was developed in the context of a researcher-practitioner partnership that provided the opportunity to align the measure not only with theory and literature about core SECs – and the widely-used Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning five broad domains (CASEL 5; Weissberg et al., 2015) – but also the school district’s SEL standards. This brief shows how such alignment informs us about how well the measure operates and also offers insights into the standards and underlying theory and practice (see Crowder et al., 2018 for the full paper on which this brief is based).","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3890967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School districts across the United States are developing systemic, district-wide approaches to support students’ social and emotional learning (SEL), due to the increasingly recognized role that students’ social-emotional competencies (SECs) play in their academic success (Domitrovich et al., 2017; Kendziora & Osher, 2016; Mahoney et al., 2017). Such initiatives have increased the need for cost-effective measures of students’ SECs that are feasible for large-scale use, embedded in scholarly literature, and aligned to local needs (Stecher & Hamilton, 2014). This brief describes evidence for one such measure, the Social-Emotional Competency Assessment (SECA), which is a self-report assessment of students’ SECs that can be used from late elementary to high school (Crowder et al., 2018; Davidson et al., 2018; Schamberg et al., 2017). The measure was developed in the context of a researcher-practitioner partnership that provided the opportunity to align the measure not only with theory and literature about core SECs – and the widely-used Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning five broad domains (CASEL 5; Weissberg et al., 2015) – but also the school district’s SEL standards. This brief shows how such alignment informs us about how well the measure operates and also offers insights into the standards and underlying theory and practice (see Crowder et al., 2018 for the full paper on which this brief is based).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会与情绪学习标准与社会情绪能力评估(SECA)的关联
由于越来越多的人认识到学生的社会情感能力(SECs)在学业成功中的作用,美国各地的学区正在开发系统的、全区的方法来支持学生的社会和情感学习(SEL) (Domitrovich et al., 2017;Kendziora & Osher, 2016;Mahoney et al., 2017)。这些举措增加了对具有成本效益的学生安全措施的需求,这些措施可以大规模使用,嵌入学术文献,并与当地需求保持一致(Stecher & Hamilton, 2014)。本文简要描述了一种这样的测量方法的证据,即社会情感能力评估(SECA),这是一种对学生的社会情感能力的自我报告评估,可以从小学后期到高中使用(Crowder等人,2018;Davidson等人,2018;Schamberg et al., 2017)。该措施是在研究人员与从业人员合作的背景下开发的,该伙伴关系不仅提供了将该措施与核心sec的理论和文献以及广泛使用的学术社会和情感学习协作五大领域(CASEL 5;Weissberg et al., 2015),以及学区的SEL标准。本摘要展示了这种一致性如何告诉我们测量的运行情况,并提供了对标准和潜在理论和实践的见解(参见Crowder等人,2018年的本摘要所基于的完整论文)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1