Producing Valid Results(Risk Mitigation and Measurement Assurance)

Philip Mistretta
{"title":"Producing Valid Results(Risk Mitigation and Measurement Assurance)","authors":"Philip Mistretta","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality measurements are not produced by accident. They are not the result of a single action, occurrence, or event. They are a collection of activities that are planned, interrelated and cohesive; they should be considered alongside the development of manufacturing processes and not an afterthought. Measurement activities are inextricably linked to product quality and manufacturing systems. These activities collectively are referred to as Measurement Quality Assurance (MQA). MQA is good for product quality and good for business, and can even be legislated. The Unites States Code of Federal regulations, Title 21- Food and Drugs states, “Each manufacturer shall ensure that all inspection, measuring, and test equipment, including mechanical, automated, or electronic inspection and test equipment, is suitable for its intended purposes and is capable of producing valid results.”(21 CFR 820.72)A comprehensive Measurement Quality Assurance program designed to mitigate risk has many components. It starts with the product design and identification of the required measurements and the process tolerances required to efficiently build a quality process or service. Once the process tolerances have been defined, test equipment must be selected to take these measurements. The test equipment selected must be suitable and appropriate for the measurement tasks and it must also be capable of producing valid results. Even the proper instrument can produce in-valid results if not handled, maintained, used and stored properly. Even if these events happen, but are not documented by objective evidence, the intent of the MQA program, mitigating risk, can be derailed.","PeriodicalId":445779,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2013","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2013.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality measurements are not produced by accident. They are not the result of a single action, occurrence, or event. They are a collection of activities that are planned, interrelated and cohesive; they should be considered alongside the development of manufacturing processes and not an afterthought. Measurement activities are inextricably linked to product quality and manufacturing systems. These activities collectively are referred to as Measurement Quality Assurance (MQA). MQA is good for product quality and good for business, and can even be legislated. The Unites States Code of Federal regulations, Title 21- Food and Drugs states, “Each manufacturer shall ensure that all inspection, measuring, and test equipment, including mechanical, automated, or electronic inspection and test equipment, is suitable for its intended purposes and is capable of producing valid results.”(21 CFR 820.72)A comprehensive Measurement Quality Assurance program designed to mitigate risk has many components. It starts with the product design and identification of the required measurements and the process tolerances required to efficiently build a quality process or service. Once the process tolerances have been defined, test equipment must be selected to take these measurements. The test equipment selected must be suitable and appropriate for the measurement tasks and it must also be capable of producing valid results. Even the proper instrument can produce in-valid results if not handled, maintained, used and stored properly. Even if these events happen, but are not documented by objective evidence, the intent of the MQA program, mitigating risk, can be derailed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产生有效的结果(风险缓解和度量保证)
质量测量不是偶然产生的。它们不是单个动作、事件或事件的结果。它们是有计划的、相互关联的和有凝聚力的活动的集合;它们应该与制造工艺的发展一起考虑,而不是事后考虑。测量活动与产品质量和制造系统密不可分。这些活动统称为度量质量保证(MQA)。MQA对产品质量有利,对企业有利,甚至可以立法。美国联邦法规,标题21-食品和药品规定,“每个制造商应确保所有的检验、测量和测试设备,包括机械的、自动化的或电子的检验和测试设备,适合其预期目的,并能够产生有效的结果。(21 CFR 820.72)旨在降低风险的全面测量质量保证计划有许多组成部分。它从产品设计和识别所需的测量以及有效构建质量过程或服务所需的过程公差开始。一旦确定了工艺公差,就必须选择测试设备来进行这些测量。所选择的测试设备必须适合测量任务,并且必须能够产生有效的结果。即使是正确的仪器,如果处理、维护、使用和储存不当,也可能产生无效的结果。即使这些事件发生了,但没有客观证据证明,MQA计划的意图,减轻风险,可以出轨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining the Uncertainty of Frequency Measurements Referenced to GPS Disciplined Oscillators The NIST Quality System for Measurement Services: A look at its Past Decade and a Gaze towards its Future New 10V Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS) and its Application for the 2014 NCSLI JVS Interlaboratory Comparison Low Frequency Accelerometer Calibration Chalenges and Improvements Inter-Laboratory Comparison Study Using Modular Instrumentation and Lesson Learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1