Personality Prediction with Natural Language Processing using Questionnaire Responses

Atharva Pansare, Prabhat Panwar, Pranali K. Kosamkar
{"title":"Personality Prediction with Natural Language Processing using Questionnaire Responses","authors":"Atharva Pansare, Prabhat Panwar, Pranali K. Kosamkar","doi":"10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the modern IT revolution is booming at a rapid growth speed, organizations and recruiters are finding it increasingly challenging to select the ideal applicant from a large number of applicants with diverse skill sets and personalities. Hence, selecting a candidate with a suitable personality for respective job profiles is a very important and great challenge for the HR department nowadays. Out of various personality prediction methods available out there, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is famous and accurate for our purpose of creating a personality prediction system for selecting candidates based on their personality. This study took into account all sixteen MB-Model coordinates. A comparative study of Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost has been done to perform personality prediction, and accuracy and confusion matrix for performance measurement of the models. While using TF-IDF, for the personality categories like Introversion/Extroversion the accuracy is 80.46%, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.70%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 81.21% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 72.97% with the Logistic Regression algorithm. Using Count vectorization for tokenizing, the accuracy is 80.97% for Introversion/Extroversion, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.93%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 77.92% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 73.48% with XGBoost algorithm, which gave the best performance.","PeriodicalId":258640,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PuneCon55413.2022.10014939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the modern IT revolution is booming at a rapid growth speed, organizations and recruiters are finding it increasingly challenging to select the ideal applicant from a large number of applicants with diverse skill sets and personalities. Hence, selecting a candidate with a suitable personality for respective job profiles is a very important and great challenge for the HR department nowadays. Out of various personality prediction methods available out there, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or MBTI is famous and accurate for our purpose of creating a personality prediction system for selecting candidates based on their personality. This study took into account all sixteen MB-Model coordinates. A comparative study of Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost has been done to perform personality prediction, and accuracy and confusion matrix for performance measurement of the models. While using TF-IDF, for the personality categories like Introversion/Extroversion the accuracy is 80.46%, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.70%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 81.21% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 72.97% with the Logistic Regression algorithm. Using Count vectorization for tokenizing, the accuracy is 80.97% for Introversion/Extroversion, for Sensing/Intuition it is 88.93%, for Thinking/Feeling it is 77.92% and for Perceiving vs Judging it is 73.48% with XGBoost algorithm, which gave the best performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于问卷回答的自然语言处理人格预测
随着现代IT革命的快速发展,组织和招聘人员发现从大量具有不同技能和个性的申请人中选择理想的申请人越来越具有挑战性。因此,为各自的岗位选择合适的候选人是当今人力资源部门面临的一个非常重要和巨大的挑战。在各种可用的人格预测方法中,迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标或MBTI是著名的和准确的,因为我们的目的是创建一个人格预测系统,根据他们的性格来选择候选人。本研究考虑了所有16个MB-Model坐标。比较研究了随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量机、XGBoost进行个性预测,并对模型的准确性和混淆矩阵进行了性能度量。在使用TF-IDF时,对于性格类别,如内向/外向,准确率为80.46%,对于感觉/直觉,准确率为88.70%,对于思考/感觉,准确率为81.21%,对于感知和判断,使用逻辑回归算法的准确率为72.97%。使用计数矢量化进行分词,内倾/外向分词准确率为80.97%,感知/直觉分词准确率为88.93%,思考/感觉分词准确率为77.92%,感知/判断分词准确率为73.48%,XGBoost算法表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Web-based Application for Snake Species Identification using Vision Transformer and CNN-based Ensemble Meta Classifier Design and Development of Autonomous Mobile Robot for Mapping and Navigation System Various Aspects and Progression of Group-Based Emotion Recognition Methods: A Review An Electroencephalogram Based Detection of Hook and Span Hand Gestures Education 4.0: Case Study on Selection of Digital Learning Platform and Communication Tools for Future Education 4.0 in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1