Initial values of skeletal muscle parameters in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis

A. Isiklar, T. Y. Kuzan
{"title":"Initial values of skeletal muscle parameters in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis","authors":"A. Isiklar, T. Y. Kuzan","doi":"10.56016/dahudermj.1246248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Predicting the clinical course of acute pancreatitis has been discussed previously on the basis of visceral adipose tissue. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis and changes in skeletal muscle parameters. \nMethod: This is a single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study. Patients who were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis between 01-28 February 2019 and had abdominal computed tomography (CT) taken in the first week of their hospitalization were included in the study. L3 level of abdominal CT images were used to evaluate skeletal muscle parameters. \nResults: During the hospital database scanning, 127 patients newly diagnosed with acute pancreatitis were included in the study. The median age was 50 (18-88) years, 47% were male, and 53% were female. The median body mass index (BMI) was 26,42 (19.4-46.8) kg/m2. Fifty-one % of patients were diagnosed with biliary acute pancreatitis, and 48.8% were diagnosed with non-biliary acute pancreatitis. At the same time, acute pancreatitis severity was classified according to revised Atlanta criteria, 67.7% were mild (n = 86), 28.3% were moderate (n = 36) and 5 (3.9%) patients were severe. Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using the total psoas index (TPI) and, skeletal muscle density calculated by HU. Median TPI was 6.3 (2.5-13.7). The median of Hounsfield Unit (HU) average calculation was 18.9 (3.8-28.5) (Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences on sex, age, BMI, skeletal muscle parameters, and acute pancreatitis clinical outcome (Table 2). \nConclusion: Skeletal muscle parameters determined by TPI and HU were not a predictor of the clinical course, and viewing them always cannot effectively investigate their effect on acute pathologies. So, this way couldn't be proposed as a perfect method for predicting the clinical outcome of acute pancreatitis.","PeriodicalId":210697,"journal":{"name":"DAHUDER Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DAHUDER Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56016/dahudermj.1246248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Predicting the clinical course of acute pancreatitis has been discussed previously on the basis of visceral adipose tissue. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis and changes in skeletal muscle parameters. Method: This is a single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective study. Patients who were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis between 01-28 February 2019 and had abdominal computed tomography (CT) taken in the first week of their hospitalization were included in the study. L3 level of abdominal CT images were used to evaluate skeletal muscle parameters. Results: During the hospital database scanning, 127 patients newly diagnosed with acute pancreatitis were included in the study. The median age was 50 (18-88) years, 47% were male, and 53% were female. The median body mass index (BMI) was 26,42 (19.4-46.8) kg/m2. Fifty-one % of patients were diagnosed with biliary acute pancreatitis, and 48.8% were diagnosed with non-biliary acute pancreatitis. At the same time, acute pancreatitis severity was classified according to revised Atlanta criteria, 67.7% were mild (n = 86), 28.3% were moderate (n = 36) and 5 (3.9%) patients were severe. Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using the total psoas index (TPI) and, skeletal muscle density calculated by HU. Median TPI was 6.3 (2.5-13.7). The median of Hounsfield Unit (HU) average calculation was 18.9 (3.8-28.5) (Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences on sex, age, BMI, skeletal muscle parameters, and acute pancreatitis clinical outcome (Table 2). Conclusion: Skeletal muscle parameters determined by TPI and HU were not a predictor of the clinical course, and viewing them always cannot effectively investigate their effect on acute pathologies. So, this way couldn't be proposed as a perfect method for predicting the clinical outcome of acute pancreatitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎患者骨骼肌参数的初始值
目的:根据内脏脂肪组织预测急性胰腺炎的临床病程已有讨论。本研究旨在确定急性胰腺炎临床结果与骨骼肌参数变化之间的关系。方法:这是一项单中心、横断面、回顾性研究。2019年2月1日至28日期间被诊断为急性胰腺炎并在住院第一周接受腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者被纳入研究。采用L3层腹部CT图像评价骨骼肌参数。结果:在医院数据库扫描期间,127例新诊断为急性胰腺炎的患者被纳入研究。中位年龄50岁(18-88岁),男性占47%,女性占53%。中位体重指数(BMI)为26.42 (19.4-46.8)kg/m2。51%的患者诊断为胆道性急性胰腺炎,48.8%的患者诊断为非胆道性急性胰腺炎。同时,根据修订后的亚特兰大标准对急性胰腺炎的严重程度进行分类,其中轻度占67.7% (n = 86),中度占28.3% (n = 36),重度占5例(3.9%)。用总腰肌指数(TPI)评估骨骼肌质量,用HU计算骨骼肌密度。TPI中位数为6.3(2.5-13.7)。Hounsfield Unit (HU)平均计算的中位数为18.9(3.8-28.5)(表1)。性别、年龄、BMI、骨骼肌参数、急性胰腺炎临床转归差异无统计学意义(表2)。结论:TPI和HU测定的骨骼肌参数不能作为临床病程的预测因子,观察骨骼肌参数往往不能有效探讨其对急性病理的影响。因此,这种方法不能作为预测急性胰腺炎临床预后的完美方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypereosinophilic syndrome: Case series and review of the literature The association between serum Perilipin-2 and kidney disease progression of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease The relationship of serum bilirubin level with histopathological parameters in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Exertional rhabdomyolysis-induced “normokalemic” severe acute kidney injury. A case report and a brief literature review The value of procalsitonin in determining the severity acute pancreatitis cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1