Theorem Provers as a Learning Tool in Theory of Computation

Maria Knobelsdorf, Christiane Frede, Sebastian Böhne, C. Kreitz
{"title":"Theorem Provers as a Learning Tool in Theory of Computation","authors":"Maria Knobelsdorf, Christiane Frede, Sebastian Böhne, C. Kreitz","doi":"10.1145/3105726.3106184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents first results of an evaluation study investigating whether an interactive theorem prover like Coq can be used to help undergraduate computer science (CS) students learn mathematical proving within the field of theory of computation. Set within an educational design research approach and building on cognitive apprenticeship and socio cultures cognition theories, we have collected empirical, mainly qualitative observational data focusing on students' activities with Coq in an introductory course specifically created for that matter. Our results strengthen the assumption that a theorem prover like Coq, indeed, can be beneficial in mediating undergraduate students' activities in learning formal proofing. In comparison to pen & paper proofs, students were profiting strongly from the system's immediate feedback and scaffolding. These results encourage the idea to extend the scientifically dominated use of theorem provers like Coq to pedagogical use cases in undergraduate CS education.","PeriodicalId":267640,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper presents first results of an evaluation study investigating whether an interactive theorem prover like Coq can be used to help undergraduate computer science (CS) students learn mathematical proving within the field of theory of computation. Set within an educational design research approach and building on cognitive apprenticeship and socio cultures cognition theories, we have collected empirical, mainly qualitative observational data focusing on students' activities with Coq in an introductory course specifically created for that matter. Our results strengthen the assumption that a theorem prover like Coq, indeed, can be beneficial in mediating undergraduate students' activities in learning formal proofing. In comparison to pen & paper proofs, students were profiting strongly from the system's immediate feedback and scaffolding. These results encourage the idea to extend the scientifically dominated use of theorem provers like Coq to pedagogical use cases in undergraduate CS education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定理证明作为计算理论的学习工具
本文介绍了一项评估研究的初步结果,该研究调查了像Coq这样的交互式定理证明器是否可以用来帮助计算机科学(CS)本科生在计算理论领域学习数学证明。在教育设计研究方法和认知学徒制和社会文化认知理论的基础上,我们收集了实证的,主要是定性的观察数据,重点关注学生在专门为此创建的入门课程中使用Coq的活动。我们的研究结果加强了这样的假设,即像Coq这样的定理证明者确实可以在中介本科生学习形式证明的活动中有益。与纸笔校样相比,学生们从系统的即时反馈和脚手架中受益匪浅。这些结果鼓励将像Coq这样的定理证明在科学上占主导地位的应用扩展到本科计算机科学教育的教学用例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hack.edu: Examining How College Hackathons Are Perceived By Student Attendees and Non-Attendees Comparison of Time Metrics in Programming Sometimes, Rainfall Accumulates: Talk-Alouds with Novice Functional Programmers Tools to Support Data-driven Reflective Learning Using Mediational Means during Learning and Understanding of Proof Assignments from Theory of Computation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1