On the Relative Efficiency of Resolution-Like Proofs and Ordered Binary Decision Diagram Proofs

Nathan Segerlind
{"title":"On the Relative Efficiency of Resolution-Like Proofs and Ordered Binary Decision Diagram Proofs","authors":"Nathan Segerlind","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2008.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that tree-like OBDD proofs of unsatisfiability require an exponential increase (s rarr 2s Omega(1)) in proof size to simulate unrestricted resolution, and that unrestricted OBDD proofs of unsatisfiability require an almost-exponential increase (s rarr 22(log s) Omega(1)) in proof size to simulate Res (O(log n)). The \"OBDD proof system\" that we consider has lines that are ordered binary decision diagrams in the same variables as the input formula, and is allowed to combine two previously derived OBDDs by any sound inference rule. In particular, this system abstracts satisfiability algorithms based upon explicit construction of OBDDs and satisfiability algorithms based upon symbolic quantifier elimination.","PeriodicalId":338061,"journal":{"name":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2008.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

We show that tree-like OBDD proofs of unsatisfiability require an exponential increase (s rarr 2s Omega(1)) in proof size to simulate unrestricted resolution, and that unrestricted OBDD proofs of unsatisfiability require an almost-exponential increase (s rarr 22(log s) Omega(1)) in proof size to simulate Res (O(log n)). The "OBDD proof system" that we consider has lines that are ordered binary decision diagrams in the same variables as the input formula, and is allowed to combine two previously derived OBDDs by any sound inference rule. In particular, this system abstracts satisfiability algorithms based upon explicit construction of OBDDs and satisfiability algorithms based upon symbolic quantifier elimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类分辨率证明与有序二元决策图证明的相对效率
我们证明了树状OBDD的不满足证明需要证明大小的指数增长(s rarr 2s Omega(1))来模拟不受限制的分辨率,而不受限制的OBDD证明需要证明大小的几乎指数增长(s rarr 22(log s) Omega(1))来模拟Res (O(log n))。我们考虑的“OBDD证明系统”具有与输入公式相同变量的有序二元决策图,并且允许通过任何合理的推理规则组合两个先前派生的OBDD。该系统对基于obdd显式构造的可满足性算法和基于符号量词消去的可满足性算法进行了抽象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting Rational Points on Hypersurfaces over Finite Fields Noisy Interpolating Sets for Low Degree Polynomials NP-Hard Sets Are Exponentially Dense Unless coNP C NP/poly Amplifying Lower Bounds by Means of Self-Reducibility On the Relative Efficiency of Resolution-Like Proofs and Ordered Binary Decision Diagram Proofs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1