Foreign Direct Investment and Agricultural Trade: The U.S.-Mexico Experience

H. Bolling, Javier Elizalde, C. Handy
{"title":"Foreign Direct Investment and Agricultural Trade: The U.S.-Mexico Experience","authors":"H. Bolling, Javier Elizalde, C. Handy","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.131702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S ome critics of NAFTA are concerned that u.s. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico's food and agricultural sector is replacing U.S. exports, and u.s. imports are replacing domestic production, causing a decline in U.S. jobs. But a closer examination of the effects of FDI points to a different story. On balance, U.S. food companies' investments have increased their sales in Mexico, without cutting into U.S. food exportS; and they have stimulated Mexican importS of U.S. agricultural raw materials and semi-processed products like vegetable oil. The drafters of the North America Free Trade Agreement of 1994 (NAFTA) saw trade liberalization as the principal means toward market integration between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. NAFTA indeed fostered rapid growth in trade among its members, including food and agricultural trade. From 1990 to 1998, U.S. exports of processed food to Mexico grew from $1.1 to $2.8 billion, and Mexican processed food exports to the United States grew from $1.0 billion to $2.3 billion. Meanwhile, FDI between the United States, Canada, and Mexico increased even more rapidly, paving the way for a regional food system with more specialization, greater trade, and changing production and consumption patterns. The importance of U.S. FDI in Mexico is evident, considering that the $6 billion in annual processed food sales generated by these investments-nearly all to the Mexican market-overshadows U.S. exports of processed food products to Mexico by more than 2 to 1. FDI is the major way that U.S. food processing firms have entered the Mexican market (figure 1). U.S. investment in Mexico's processed food industry The stock of U.S. investment in Mexico's food processing industry increased from $321 million in 1986 to $5 .0 billion in 1997 (figure 2). The trend began when the Mexican government changed investment rules in the late 1980s. Then the enactment of NAFTA in 1994 spurred Mexican economic growth, leading to increased investor confidence and a synergy between trade and investment. Mexico is now the third largest host for U.S. FDI","PeriodicalId":185368,"journal":{"name":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.131702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

S ome critics of NAFTA are concerned that u.s. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico's food and agricultural sector is replacing U.S. exports, and u.s. imports are replacing domestic production, causing a decline in U.S. jobs. But a closer examination of the effects of FDI points to a different story. On balance, U.S. food companies' investments have increased their sales in Mexico, without cutting into U.S. food exportS; and they have stimulated Mexican importS of U.S. agricultural raw materials and semi-processed products like vegetable oil. The drafters of the North America Free Trade Agreement of 1994 (NAFTA) saw trade liberalization as the principal means toward market integration between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. NAFTA indeed fostered rapid growth in trade among its members, including food and agricultural trade. From 1990 to 1998, U.S. exports of processed food to Mexico grew from $1.1 to $2.8 billion, and Mexican processed food exports to the United States grew from $1.0 billion to $2.3 billion. Meanwhile, FDI between the United States, Canada, and Mexico increased even more rapidly, paving the way for a regional food system with more specialization, greater trade, and changing production and consumption patterns. The importance of U.S. FDI in Mexico is evident, considering that the $6 billion in annual processed food sales generated by these investments-nearly all to the Mexican market-overshadows U.S. exports of processed food products to Mexico by more than 2 to 1. FDI is the major way that U.S. food processing firms have entered the Mexican market (figure 1). U.S. investment in Mexico's processed food industry The stock of U.S. investment in Mexico's food processing industry increased from $321 million in 1986 to $5 .0 billion in 1997 (figure 2). The trend began when the Mexican government changed investment rules in the late 1980s. Then the enactment of NAFTA in 1994 spurred Mexican economic growth, leading to increased investor confidence and a synergy between trade and investment. Mexico is now the third largest host for U.S. FDI
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外国直接投资和农业贸易:美国和墨西哥的经验
一些批评北美自由贸易协定的人士担心,美国在墨西哥食品和农业部门的外国直接投资(FDI)正在取代美国的出口,美国的进口正在取代国内生产,导致美国就业机会减少。但对外国直接投资的影响进行更仔细的研究,结果却截然不同。总的来说,美国食品公司的投资增加了他们在墨西哥的销售,而没有减少美国的食品出口;刺激了墨西哥对美国农业原材料和植物油等半成品的进口。1994年北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)的起草者将贸易自由化视为美国、加拿大和墨西哥之间实现市场一体化的主要手段。北美自由贸易协定确实促进了成员国之间贸易的快速增长,包括食品和农业贸易。从1990年到1998年,美国对墨西哥的加工食品出口从11亿美元增长到28亿美元,墨西哥对美国的加工食品出口从10亿美元增长到23亿美元。与此同时,美国、加拿大和墨西哥之间的外国直接投资增长更快,为建立一个更加专业化、贸易规模更大、生产和消费模式不断变化的区域粮食体系铺平了道路。美国在墨西哥的外国直接投资的重要性是显而易见的,考虑到这些投资产生的每年60亿美元的加工食品销售额——几乎全部进入墨西哥市场——比美国对墨西哥的加工食品出口多出2比1。外国直接投资是美国食品加工公司进入墨西哥市场的主要方式(图1)。美国对墨西哥加工食品工业的投资美国对墨西哥食品加工工业的投资存量从1986年的3.21亿美元增加到1997年的50亿美元(图2)。这一趋势始于20世纪80年代末墨西哥政府改变投资规则。1994年北美自由贸易协定的颁布刺激了墨西哥的经济增长,增加了投资者的信心,促进了贸易和投资之间的协同作用。墨西哥现在是美国对外直接投资的第三大东道国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transportation Safety Regulations via the Electronic Logging Device Mandate Can Affect Fresh Produce Shipment Costs Do Big Cows Bring Big Proftis? Public Grazing Fee Policy’s Impact on Cow Size The Impact of COVID-19 on United States Meat and Livestock Markets Consumer Food Buying during a Recession COVID-19 Risk Factors Vary by Legal Status among Florida Crop Workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1