An evaluation and enhancement of densitometric fragmentation for content slicing reuse

Killian Levacher, S. Lawless, V. Wade
{"title":"An evaluation and enhancement of densitometric fragmentation for content slicing reuse","authors":"Killian Levacher, S. Lawless, V. Wade","doi":"10.1145/2396761.2398652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Content slicing addresses the need of adaptive systems to reuse open corpus material by converting it into re-composable information objects. However this conversion is highly dependent upon the ability to correctly fragment pages into structurally sound atomic pieces. A recently suggested approach to fragmentation, which relies on densitometric page representation, claims to achieve high accuracy and time performance. Although it has been well received within the research community, a full evaluation of this approach and identification of strengths and weaknesses across a range of characteristics hasn't been performed. This paper proposes an independent evaluation of the approach with respect to granularity control, accuracy, time performance, content diversity and linguistic dependency. Moreover, this paper also provides a significant contribution to address important weaknesses discovered during the analysis, in order to improve the suitability and impact of the original algorithm within the context of content slicing.","PeriodicalId":313414,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2398652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Content slicing addresses the need of adaptive systems to reuse open corpus material by converting it into re-composable information objects. However this conversion is highly dependent upon the ability to correctly fragment pages into structurally sound atomic pieces. A recently suggested approach to fragmentation, which relies on densitometric page representation, claims to achieve high accuracy and time performance. Although it has been well received within the research community, a full evaluation of this approach and identification of strengths and weaknesses across a range of characteristics hasn't been performed. This paper proposes an independent evaluation of the approach with respect to granularity control, accuracy, time performance, content diversity and linguistic dependency. Moreover, this paper also provides a significant contribution to address important weaknesses discovered during the analysis, in order to improve the suitability and impact of the original algorithm within the context of content slicing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向内容切片重用的密度碎片评价与改进
内容切片解决了自适应系统通过将开放语料库材料转换为可重新组合的信息对象来重用开放语料库材料的需求。然而,这种转换高度依赖于将页面正确地分割成结构合理的原子块的能力。最近提出的一种碎片化方法,它依赖于密度计页面表示,声称可以实现高精度和时间性能。尽管它在研究界得到了广泛的认可,但尚未对该方法进行全面评估,并在一系列特征中确定其优缺点。本文从粒度控制、准确性、时间性能、内容多样性和语言依赖性等方面对该方法进行了独立评估。此外,本文还为解决分析过程中发现的重要弱点做出了重要贡献,以提高原始算法在内容切片环境中的适用性和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting web search success with fine-grained interaction data User activity profiling with multi-layer analysis Search result presentation based on faceted clustering Domain dependent query reformulation for web search CrowdTiles: presenting crowd-based information for event-driven information needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1