CSCL argumentation systems: how do empirical results and emerging technologies inform system development?

Niels Pinkwart, Frank Loll, Oliver Scheuer, B. McLaren
{"title":"CSCL argumentation systems: how do empirical results and emerging technologies inform system development?","authors":"Niels Pinkwart, Frank Loll, Oliver Scheuer, B. McLaren","doi":"10.3115/1599503.1599585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workshop Content Many CSCL systems at least implicitly relate to argumentation since they allow students to learn and construct knowledge collaboratively. There has been considerable effort in developing and assessing educational technology to support argumentation within the CSCL community. Many of these efforts have been shown to be effective for specific argumentation domains. At the same time, the general design problem of how to support a learner’s acquisition of argumentation skills via computer support has not been solved and is still an important item on today’s CSCL research agenda. Also, the affordances of new technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, Social Software, collaborative virtual environments, mobile devices, etc.) for argumentative CSCL systems have not been thoroughly investigated yet. The central goal of this workshop is to bring together two types of researchers, (a) those with an educational/psychological background who are interested in approaches to support the acquisition of argumentation skills and empirical studies, and (b) those with a more technology-oriented perspective who are interested in groupware systems for argumentation and the novel opportunities that come with “Social Software”, emerging web technologies, and other modern programming principles and technologies. These two groups will have the opportunity to meet and discuss the technological implications of recent empirical findings on argumentation and to discuss which aspects of novel technologies are worth further empirical investigation from the viewpoint of argumentation.","PeriodicalId":120843,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1599503.1599585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workshop Content Many CSCL systems at least implicitly relate to argumentation since they allow students to learn and construct knowledge collaboratively. There has been considerable effort in developing and assessing educational technology to support argumentation within the CSCL community. Many of these efforts have been shown to be effective for specific argumentation domains. At the same time, the general design problem of how to support a learner’s acquisition of argumentation skills via computer support has not been solved and is still an important item on today’s CSCL research agenda. Also, the affordances of new technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, Social Software, collaborative virtual environments, mobile devices, etc.) for argumentative CSCL systems have not been thoroughly investigated yet. The central goal of this workshop is to bring together two types of researchers, (a) those with an educational/psychological background who are interested in approaches to support the acquisition of argumentation skills and empirical studies, and (b) those with a more technology-oriented perspective who are interested in groupware systems for argumentation and the novel opportunities that come with “Social Software”, emerging web technologies, and other modern programming principles and technologies. These two groups will have the opportunity to meet and discuss the technological implications of recent empirical findings on argumentation and to discuss which aspects of novel technologies are worth further empirical investigation from the viewpoint of argumentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CSCL论证系统:实证结果和新兴技术如何为系统开发提供信息?
许多CSCL系统至少隐含地与论证相关,因为它们允许学生协作学习和构建知识。在开发和评估教育技术以支持CSCL社区内的辩论方面已经做出了相当大的努力。许多这些努力已被证明对特定的论证领域是有效的。与此同时,如何通过计算机支持来支持学习者论证技能的习得这一总体设计问题一直没有得到解决,仍然是当今CSCL研究议程上的一个重要项目。此外,对于论证式CSCL系统的新技术(例如,Web 2.0、社交软件、协作虚拟环境、移动设备等)的支持还没有得到彻底的调查。本次研讨会的中心目标是将两类研究人员聚集在一起,(a)具有教育/心理学背景的研究人员,他们对支持获得论证技能和实证研究的方法感兴趣;(b)具有更以技术为导向的观点的研究人员,他们对论证群件系统和“社交软件”、新兴网络技术带来的新机会感兴趣。以及其他现代编程原则和技术。这两个小组将有机会会面并讨论最近实证研究结果对论证的技术含义,并从论证的角度讨论新技术的哪些方面值得进一步的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding Teachers' Collaboration for Designing Technology-Enhanced Learning Predicting Success in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Using Cohesion Network Analysis Identification of Patterns of Tool Use and Sketching Practices in a Learning By Design Task Phases of Design: Following Idea Development and Patterns of Collaborative Discussion in a Learning By Design Project Discovering Dependencies: A Case Study of Collaborative Dynamic Mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1