Comparison of Various Rate-Decline Analysis Models for Horizontal Wells with Multiple Fractures in Shale gas Reservoirs

Y. Miao, Xiangfang Li, John W. Lee, Chaojie Zhao, Yunjian Zhou, Hang Li, Yucui Chang, Wenjing Lin, Zhihua Xiao, Nan Wu
{"title":"Comparison of Various Rate-Decline Analysis Models for Horizontal Wells with Multiple Fractures in Shale gas Reservoirs","authors":"Y. Miao, Xiangfang Li, John W. Lee, Chaojie Zhao, Yunjian Zhou, Hang Li, Yucui Chang, Wenjing Lin, Zhihua Xiao, Nan Wu","doi":"10.2118/191185-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, improving the accuracy of production forecast in unconventional reservoirs has been of growing interest to oil and gas industries. Decline curve analysis (DCA) models have been recognized as the most efficient and easiest approaches to estimate gas rate. However, fluid flow regime and well rate decline curves are highly affected by the geological properties of formations. Therefore, the selection of DCA models based on completion designs and geological properties of formations is important for production rate prediction.\n Traditional DCA methods, particularly Arps' decline model, was originally developed for predicting boundary dominated hydrocarbon well rate decline, which differs from the dominant long-duration transient flow regime in shale reservoirs. The Stretched Exponential model, the Duong model, the Arps model with a minimum terminal decline rate and the scaling method by Patzek were developed to match and forecast wells with transient flow followed by boundary dominated flow (BDF). In this paper, firstly we developed a new model to estimate production in shale gas reserviors by considering both Knudsen diffusion of bulk gas and surface diffusion of adsorbed gas based on the traditional equation of rate versus square-root-of-time. This proposed model can provide better fits to data in transient linear flow regimes. In addition, a systematic analysis of numerical simulation cases in CMG were performed to compare with the traditional model.\n The results demonstrated that, in most cases, our model which is demonstrated in this paper, provide more accurate estimation of reserves for numerically simulated cases compared with the traditional decline methods. Therefore, the work offers critical insights into evaluating production in shale gas reserviors in a more efficient way.","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191185-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, improving the accuracy of production forecast in unconventional reservoirs has been of growing interest to oil and gas industries. Decline curve analysis (DCA) models have been recognized as the most efficient and easiest approaches to estimate gas rate. However, fluid flow regime and well rate decline curves are highly affected by the geological properties of formations. Therefore, the selection of DCA models based on completion designs and geological properties of formations is important for production rate prediction. Traditional DCA methods, particularly Arps' decline model, was originally developed for predicting boundary dominated hydrocarbon well rate decline, which differs from the dominant long-duration transient flow regime in shale reservoirs. The Stretched Exponential model, the Duong model, the Arps model with a minimum terminal decline rate and the scaling method by Patzek were developed to match and forecast wells with transient flow followed by boundary dominated flow (BDF). In this paper, firstly we developed a new model to estimate production in shale gas reserviors by considering both Knudsen diffusion of bulk gas and surface diffusion of adsorbed gas based on the traditional equation of rate versus square-root-of-time. This proposed model can provide better fits to data in transient linear flow regimes. In addition, a systematic analysis of numerical simulation cases in CMG were performed to compare with the traditional model. The results demonstrated that, in most cases, our model which is demonstrated in this paper, provide more accurate estimation of reserves for numerically simulated cases compared with the traditional decline methods. Therefore, the work offers critical insights into evaluating production in shale gas reserviors in a more efficient way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
页岩气藏多裂缝水平井不同递减率分析模型的比较
近年来,提高非常规油藏产量预测的准确性已成为油气行业日益关注的问题。递减曲线分析(DCA)模型被认为是估算含气量最有效、最简单的方法。然而,流体流动状态和井速递减曲线受地层地质性质的影响较大。因此,根据完井设计和地层地质性质选择DCA模型对产量预测具有重要意义。传统的DCA方法,特别是Arps的递减模型,最初是为了预测边界主导的烃类井速递减而开发的,这与页岩储层中主导的长时间瞬态流动模式不同。采用拉伸指数模型、Duong模型、终端递递率最小的Arps模型和Patzek标度法,拟合和预测了瞬态流后边界主导流(BDF)井。本文首先在传统的速率-时间平方根方程的基础上,建立了同时考虑整体气的Knudsen扩散和吸附气的表面扩散的页岩气储层产量估算模型。该模型能较好地拟合瞬态线性流态的数据。此外,还对CMG的数值模拟实例进行了系统分析,并与传统模型进行了比较。结果表明,在大多数情况下,与传统的递减方法相比,本文所证明的模型在数值模拟情况下提供了更准确的储量估计。因此,这项工作为以更有效的方式评估页岩气储层的产量提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization under Uncertainty for Reliable Unconventional Play Evaluation. A Case Study in Vaca Muerta Shale Gas Blocks, Argentina Stability Improvement of CO2 Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications Using Nanoparticles and Viscoelastic Surfactants Effect of Temperature, Phase Change, and Chemical Additive on Wettability Alteration During Steam Applications in Sands and Carbonates Application of the Capacitance Model in Primary Production Period before IOR Implementation Transient and Boundary Dominated Flow Temperature Analysis under Variable Rate Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1