Medical and Pharmacy Students Learning Trends in the COVID-19 Pandemic

S. Nilaad, A. Apperson, L. Lander, S. Evans, L. C. Crotty Alexander
{"title":"Medical and Pharmacy Students Learning Trends in the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"S. Nilaad, A. Apperson, L. Lander, S. Evans, L. C. Crotty Alexander","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic can be seen as a source of disruption for many people's lives, but it has also served as a stimulus, changing the medical education environment. In response to the pandemic, UC San Diego School of Medicine converted its in-person preclerkship education into an online format using the software combination of the Zoom video communication, Panopto video platform and Canvas learning platform. By using data from the COVID-19 virtual format (CVF) and the in-person format (IPF) in the fall of 2019 extracted from Panopto and Canvas, we compared student lecture viewing trends and analyzed Canvas student usage to determine if student engagement to educational material has differed between the two learning structures. Methods: Student lecture viewing data were collected by using the “Analytics” function built into Panopto which recorded student views, lecture viewing completion, viewing trends over time, and total time spent watching lectures. On Canvas, data on student click-through rates for resources provided to students were extracted comparing this year to last year. Data acquired from Zoom was used to observe student attendance during lectures that were held synchronously. All statistics (t-tests) were calculated using Prism. Results: In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a higher proportion of CVF students that watched the recorded live lectures compared to the in-person 2019 class (p=0.011). The CVF class also had a higher recorded lecture completion rate (p=0.003). It was observed that on average, 57.2% of CVF students attended live Zoom lectures if they were held. 56.3% of all CVF students also watched the live lecture recording, which indicates that a small proportion of students are re-watching the lecture after viewing them synchronously. Discussion: CVF students are more likely to watch and have higher complete rates of recorded live lectures compared to the IPF counterpart. These observations are significant as they indicate a change in student learning behavior in this predominantly virtual environment. Students may be more inclined to the flexibility that the virtual format offers. Further studies should be done to assess student performance between the CVF and IPF formats.","PeriodicalId":234316,"journal":{"name":"TP12. TP012 MEDICAL EDUCATION IN PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP12. TP012 MEDICAL EDUCATION IN PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic can be seen as a source of disruption for many people's lives, but it has also served as a stimulus, changing the medical education environment. In response to the pandemic, UC San Diego School of Medicine converted its in-person preclerkship education into an online format using the software combination of the Zoom video communication, Panopto video platform and Canvas learning platform. By using data from the COVID-19 virtual format (CVF) and the in-person format (IPF) in the fall of 2019 extracted from Panopto and Canvas, we compared student lecture viewing trends and analyzed Canvas student usage to determine if student engagement to educational material has differed between the two learning structures. Methods: Student lecture viewing data were collected by using the “Analytics” function built into Panopto which recorded student views, lecture viewing completion, viewing trends over time, and total time spent watching lectures. On Canvas, data on student click-through rates for resources provided to students were extracted comparing this year to last year. Data acquired from Zoom was used to observe student attendance during lectures that were held synchronously. All statistics (t-tests) were calculated using Prism. Results: In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a higher proportion of CVF students that watched the recorded live lectures compared to the in-person 2019 class (p=0.011). The CVF class also had a higher recorded lecture completion rate (p=0.003). It was observed that on average, 57.2% of CVF students attended live Zoom lectures if they were held. 56.3% of all CVF students also watched the live lecture recording, which indicates that a small proportion of students are re-watching the lecture after viewing them synchronously. Discussion: CVF students are more likely to watch and have higher complete rates of recorded live lectures compared to the IPF counterpart. These observations are significant as they indicate a change in student learning behavior in this predominantly virtual environment. Students may be more inclined to the flexibility that the virtual format offers. Further studies should be done to assess student performance between the CVF and IPF formats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学和药学专业学生在COVID-19大流行中的学习趋势
导语:COVID-19大流行可以被视为许多人生活中断的来源,但它也起到了刺激作用,改变了医学教育环境。为应对疫情,加州大学圣地亚哥分校医学院利用Zoom视频通信、Panopto视频平台和Canvas学习平台的软件组合,将其面对面的见习教育转变为在线形式。通过使用2019年秋季从Panopto和Canvas中提取的COVID-19虚拟格式(CVF)和面对面格式(IPF)的数据,我们比较了学生的讲座观看趋势,并分析了Canvas学生的使用情况,以确定两种学习结构之间学生对教育材料的参与度是否存在差异。方法:使用Panopto内置的“Analytics”功能收集学生的讲座观看数据,记录学生的观看次数、讲座观看完成情况、观看时间趋势和观看讲座的总时间。在Canvas上,学生对提供给学生的资源的点击率数据被提取出来与去年进行比较。从Zoom获得的数据用于观察同步举行的讲座期间学生的出勤率。所有统计量(t检验)均使用Prism计算。结果:在2019冠状病毒病大流行背景下,与2019年现场授课相比,CVF学生观看录制的现场讲座的比例更高(p=0.011)。CVF班也有更高的记录讲座完成率(p=0.003)。据观察,平均57.2%的CVF学生参加了现场Zoom讲座,如果他们举行。56.3%的CVF学生还观看了现场讲座录音,这表明有一小部分学生在同步观看讲座后重新观看了讲座。讨论:与IPF学生相比,CVF学生更有可能观看并拥有更高的录制现场讲座完成率。这些观察结果很重要,因为它们表明了学生在虚拟环境中学习行为的变化。学生们可能更倾向于虚拟形式提供的灵活性。应该进行进一步的研究,以评估CVF和IPF格式之间的学生表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Social Media by Pulmonary Critical Care Fellowship Applicants to Evaluate Training Programs Do Ward Rounds Offer Effective Teaching and Training? Obstacles to Learning and What Makes Good Teaching in a Large Tertiary Care Hospital from Trainee Doctor's Perspective Resident Experience, Attitudes and Opinions on the Delivery of End of Life Care in the ICU Medical and Pharmacy Students Learning Trends in the COVID-19 Pandemic Use of the Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool to Enhance Post Procedural Feedback for Pulmonary Fellows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1