Diversity of Traditional Fermented Foods: Sucrose and Reducing Sugar Analysis of Various Fermented-Cassava

D. Sb, Inayah Inayah, D. Puspaningtyas, P. Sari, Nanda Herdiyanti Kusuma
{"title":"Diversity of Traditional Fermented Foods: Sucrose and Reducing Sugar Analysis of Various Fermented-Cassava","authors":"D. Sb, Inayah Inayah, D. Puspaningtyas, P. Sari, Nanda Herdiyanti Kusuma","doi":"10.31098/cpmhs.v2i1.627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cassava and its various fermented products are one of the local foods in Indonesia. The fermentation process can have different effects on food, both in taste and nutritional value. Changes in sucrose and reduced sugar levels during fermentation play a role in determining food effects in various health disorders. This study aims to describe the impact of cassava fermentation on different fermented products (tape, growol, gathot) in terms of sucrose and reducing sugar levels. This observational laboratory research was done through two stages, i.e., qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis examined carbohydrates' presence (monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides) through the Molisch test, Benedict's test, and the Iodine test. Quantitative analysis was carried out to determine sucrose and reducing sugar levels using three replicates with the Nelson-Somogyi test. The research was conducted in January-July 2019 at Universitas Respati Yogyakarta and Chem-mix Pratama Laboratory. The statistical analysis used was One Way Anova at a 5% significance level and continued with the Tukey test. Qualitative tests showed cassava, tape, growol, and gathot contained monosaccharides and polysaccharides. Benedict's test results showed that growol did not have reducing sugars. The quantitative test showed Growol's reducing sugar content was the lowest (0.32%) compared to cassava (0.95%), tape (14.87%), and gathot (11.12%). The highest sucrose content was in cassava (4.77%) followed by growol (2.36%), tape (1.47%), and gathot (0.78%). There were significant differences in sucrose and reducing sugars levels between cassava, tape, growol, and gathot (p<0.001). In conclusion, growol is a fermented food that can be used as a functional food.","PeriodicalId":142358,"journal":{"name":"RSF Conference Proceeding Series: Medical and Health Science","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSF Conference Proceeding Series: Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31098/cpmhs.v2i1.627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cassava and its various fermented products are one of the local foods in Indonesia. The fermentation process can have different effects on food, both in taste and nutritional value. Changes in sucrose and reduced sugar levels during fermentation play a role in determining food effects in various health disorders. This study aims to describe the impact of cassava fermentation on different fermented products (tape, growol, gathot) in terms of sucrose and reducing sugar levels. This observational laboratory research was done through two stages, i.e., qualitative and quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis examined carbohydrates' presence (monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides) through the Molisch test, Benedict's test, and the Iodine test. Quantitative analysis was carried out to determine sucrose and reducing sugar levels using three replicates with the Nelson-Somogyi test. The research was conducted in January-July 2019 at Universitas Respati Yogyakarta and Chem-mix Pratama Laboratory. The statistical analysis used was One Way Anova at a 5% significance level and continued with the Tukey test. Qualitative tests showed cassava, tape, growol, and gathot contained monosaccharides and polysaccharides. Benedict's test results showed that growol did not have reducing sugars. The quantitative test showed Growol's reducing sugar content was the lowest (0.32%) compared to cassava (0.95%), tape (14.87%), and gathot (11.12%). The highest sucrose content was in cassava (4.77%) followed by growol (2.36%), tape (1.47%), and gathot (0.78%). There were significant differences in sucrose and reducing sugars levels between cassava, tape, growol, and gathot (p<0.001). In conclusion, growol is a fermented food that can be used as a functional food.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统发酵食品的多样性:各种发酵木薯的蔗糖和还原糖分析
木薯及其各种发酵产品是印度尼西亚的当地食品之一。发酵过程可以对食物的味道和营养价值产生不同的影响。发酵过程中蔗糖和还原糖水平的变化在决定食物对各种健康疾病的影响方面起着重要作用。本研究的目的是描述木薯发酵对不同发酵产品(磁带,growol, gathot)的蔗糖和还原糖水平的影响。本观察性实验室研究分为定性分析和定量分析两个阶段。定性分析通过Molisch试验、Benedict试验和碘试验检测了碳水化合物(单糖、双糖、低聚糖、多糖)的存在。采用Nelson-Somogyi试验进行定量分析,测定蔗糖和还原糖水平。该研究于2019年1月至7月在日惹Respati大学和Chem-mix Pratama实验室进行。统计分析采用单因素方差分析(One Way Anova),显著性水平为5%,并继续采用Tukey检验。定性试验表明,木薯、木薯带、甘露醇和甘露都含有单糖和多糖。本尼迪克特的测试结果显示,咆哮酒不含还原糖。定量试验表明,与木薯(0.95%)、胶带(14.87%)和甘薯(11.12%)相比,甘薯的还原糖含量最低(0.32%)。蔗糖含量最高的是木薯(4.77%),其次是甘露(2.36%)、胶带(1.47%)和甘露(0.78%)。蔗糖和还原糖水平在木薯、胶带、甘露和甘露之间有显著差异(p<0.001)。综上所述,酵母醇是一种可作为功能性食品使用的发酵食品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlations Between Knowledge About Landslides and Preparedness for Disasters: Cross-Sectional Study Diversity of Traditional Fermented Foods: Sucrose and Reducing Sugar Analysis of Various Fermented-Cassava Research on Covid-19 Human Security Disaster Management in Indonesia Using VOSviewer Bibliometrics Factors Related to Community Preparedness in Dealing with a Mountain Disaster Erupting: A Literature Review Correlation of Knowledge and Patient Diet to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1