The Competition Neutrality in Malaysia: Challenges and Policy Options

Angayar Kanni Ramaiah
{"title":"The Competition Neutrality in Malaysia: Challenges and Policy Options","authors":"Angayar Kanni Ramaiah","doi":"10.24191/jibe.v3i2.14432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition law (CL) prevents anti-competitive conducts but does not ensure fair competition or level playing field with respect to State-Owned enterprises (SOEs). Hence, the principle of competitive neutrality promotes that government related business activities in competition with the private sector should not have a competitive advantage or disadvantage simply by virtue of government ownership and control (UNCTAD). Therefore, specific policies and legal rules is essential for achieving competitive neutrality. The Malaysian, Competition Act 2010 (CA2010) subjectively restricts and excludes some government linked enterprises. However, the some economic or, legal policy and political reasons limits CLs applicability and dictates its scope subjectively. In these context exemptions, de facto or de jure, direct or indirect state aid and restrictive licensing requirements impairs competition to benefit the domestic economy or national champion. This practice impacts the true spirit of market competition among rivals. Although Malaysian SOEs recognised as government’s toolbox for societal and public value creation but its future should to be more actively owned and managed to avoid competing unfairly on enterprises that can deliver more efficiently and effectively the goods and services that citizens need and want. In this context, three principal questions from the international trade perspective is analysed on (1) How important is state ownership within Malaysian context (2) What types of advantages should be granted to SOEs (or disadvantages afflicting them) and (3) What policies required to enhance effective competition among all market participants? The paper reviews the state of SOE with respect to exemptions and exclusions policy with respect to governance, independent decision-making, accountability and disclosure policy to improvise the level playing scope between SOE and private sector within the competition law perspective in Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":258234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/jibe.v3i2.14432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competition law (CL) prevents anti-competitive conducts but does not ensure fair competition or level playing field with respect to State-Owned enterprises (SOEs). Hence, the principle of competitive neutrality promotes that government related business activities in competition with the private sector should not have a competitive advantage or disadvantage simply by virtue of government ownership and control (UNCTAD). Therefore, specific policies and legal rules is essential for achieving competitive neutrality. The Malaysian, Competition Act 2010 (CA2010) subjectively restricts and excludes some government linked enterprises. However, the some economic or, legal policy and political reasons limits CLs applicability and dictates its scope subjectively. In these context exemptions, de facto or de jure, direct or indirect state aid and restrictive licensing requirements impairs competition to benefit the domestic economy or national champion. This practice impacts the true spirit of market competition among rivals. Although Malaysian SOEs recognised as government’s toolbox for societal and public value creation but its future should to be more actively owned and managed to avoid competing unfairly on enterprises that can deliver more efficiently and effectively the goods and services that citizens need and want. In this context, three principal questions from the international trade perspective is analysed on (1) How important is state ownership within Malaysian context (2) What types of advantages should be granted to SOEs (or disadvantages afflicting them) and (3) What policies required to enhance effective competition among all market participants? The paper reviews the state of SOE with respect to exemptions and exclusions policy with respect to governance, independent decision-making, accountability and disclosure policy to improvise the level playing scope between SOE and private sector within the competition law perspective in Malaysia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚的竞争中立:挑战与政策选择
竞争法(CL)防止反竞争行为,但不确保公平竞争或公平的竞争环境对国有企业(soe)。因此,竞争中立原则主张,与私营部门竞争的与政府有关的商业活动不应仅仅因为政府拥有和控制而具有竞争优势或劣势(贸发会议)。因此,具体的政策和法律规则对于实现竞争中立至关重要。马来西亚2010年竞争法(CA2010)主观上限制和排除了一些政府关联企业。然而,一些经济、法律政策和政治原因限制了法律的适用范围,主观上决定了法律的适用范围。在这种情况下,豁免,事实上的或法律上的,直接或间接的国家援助和限制性许可要求损害了竞争,使国内经济或国家冠军企业受益。这种做法影响了竞争对手之间真正的市场竞争精神。虽然马来西亚国有企业被认为是政府创造社会和公共价值的工具箱,但它的未来应该被更积极地拥有和管理,以避免与那些能够更有效地提供公民需要和想要的商品和服务的企业进行不公平竞争。在此背景下,从国际贸易的角度分析了三个主要问题:(1)在马来西亚的背景下国有制有多重要;(2)应该赋予国有企业什么样的优势(或影响它们的劣势);(3)需要什么样的政策来加强所有市场参与者之间的有效竞争?本文从马来西亚竞争法的角度回顾了国有企业在治理、独立决策、问责制和披露政策方面的豁免和排除政策,以提高国有企业和私营部门之间的公平竞争范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of Waqf Contribution Awareness among Indonesian Workers Through Digital System Beyond Supply Chains: Investigating the Economic Impact of Logistics Performance The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Event Management Industry Are You a Panic Buyer? Observations from Consumers in Malaysia The Challenges of Disabled Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1