Learning Analytics for Blended Learning: A Systematic Review of Theory, Methodology, and Ethical Considerations

Nina Bergdahl, Jalal Nouri, Thashmee Karunaratne, M. Afzaal, Mohammed Saqr
{"title":"Learning Analytics for Blended Learning: A Systematic Review of Theory, Methodology, and Ethical Considerations","authors":"Nina Bergdahl, Jalal Nouri, Thashmee Karunaratne, M. Afzaal, Mohammed Saqr","doi":"10.3991/ijai.v2i2.17887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Analytics (LA) approaches in Blended Learning (BL) research is becoming an established field. In the light of previous critiqued toward LA for not being grounded in theory, the General Data Protection and a renewed focus on individuals’ integrity, this review aims to explore the use of theories, the methodological and analytic approaches in educational settings, along with surveying ethical and legal considerations. The review also maps and explores the outcomes and discusses the pitfalls and potentials currently seen in the field. Journal articles and conference papers were identified through systematic search across relevant databases. 70 papers met the inclusion criteria:  they applied LA within a BL setting, were peer-reviewed, full-papers, and if they were in English. The results reveal that the use of theoretical and methodological approaches was disperse, we identified approaches of BL not included in categories of BL in existing BL literature and suggest these may be referred to as hybrid blended learning, that ethical considerations and legal requirements have often been overlooked. We highlight critical issues that contribute to raise awareness and inform alignment for future research to ameliorate diffuse applications within the field of LA.","PeriodicalId":165037,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Learn. Anal. Artif. Intell. Educ.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Learn. Anal. Artif. Intell. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.17887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Learning Analytics (LA) approaches in Blended Learning (BL) research is becoming an established field. In the light of previous critiqued toward LA for not being grounded in theory, the General Data Protection and a renewed focus on individuals’ integrity, this review aims to explore the use of theories, the methodological and analytic approaches in educational settings, along with surveying ethical and legal considerations. The review also maps and explores the outcomes and discusses the pitfalls and potentials currently seen in the field. Journal articles and conference papers were identified through systematic search across relevant databases. 70 papers met the inclusion criteria:  they applied LA within a BL setting, were peer-reviewed, full-papers, and if they were in English. The results reveal that the use of theoretical and methodological approaches was disperse, we identified approaches of BL not included in categories of BL in existing BL literature and suggest these may be referred to as hybrid blended learning, that ethical considerations and legal requirements have often been overlooked. We highlight critical issues that contribute to raise awareness and inform alignment for future research to ameliorate diffuse applications within the field of LA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合式学习的学习分析:理论、方法和伦理考虑的系统回顾
混合学习(BL)研究中的学习分析(LA)方法正在成为一个成熟的领域。鉴于之前对洛杉矶不以理论为基础的批评,《通用数据保护》和对个人诚信的重新关注,本综述旨在探索理论、方法和分析方法在教育环境中的应用,以及调查道德和法律考虑。该评论还绘制和探讨了结果,并讨论了目前在该领域看到的陷阱和潜力。通过对相关数据库的系统检索,确定了期刊文章和会议论文。70篇论文符合纳入标准:他们在BL设置中应用了LA,是同行评审的,全文论文,如果他们是英文的。结果表明,理论和方法方法的使用是分散的,我们发现了现有的BL文献中不包括在BL类别中的BL方法,并建议这些方法可能被称为混合混合学习,伦理考虑和法律要求经常被忽视。我们强调了有助于提高认识的关键问题,并为未来的研究提供信息,以改善洛杉矶领域内的扩散应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Extraction from Binary Skill Assessment Data with Machine Learning Redesigning a First Year Physiology Course using Learning Analytics to Improve Student Performance Improving Students Performance in Small-Scale Online Courses - A Machine Learning-Based Intervention Learning Analytics for Blended Learning: A Systematic Review of Theory, Methodology, and Ethical Considerations Recommender - Potentials and Limitations for Self-Study in Higher Education from an Educational Science Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1