Prioritization in Private-Activity-Bond Volume Cap Allocation

S. Whitaker
{"title":"Prioritization in Private-Activity-Bond Volume Cap Allocation","authors":"S. Whitaker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1825226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes and tests a structural model reflecting the process of authorizing private-activity municipal bond issuance. Private-activity municipal bonds offer tax-exempt financing for programs including industrial development, utilities, low-income housing, and student loans. The Federal tax code sets annual caps on the total tax-exempt issuance within each state, so authorization becomes a scarce resource distributed via a political process. Interviews with program administrators in several states suggested the authorization process involves prioritizing categories of use, authorizing bonds for high-priority uses first, and then authorizing bonds for lower-priority uses until the cap is exhausted. A model representing this process suggests variables to include in reduced-form estimations and an alternative interpretation of the coefficients. The fit of the model can be improved by adding measures of political influence and imposing a structure that reflects the political prioritization process. In general, industrial development and utilities appear to be the highest priority uses of private-activity municipal bonds. Mortgage revenue bonds are the residual category most frequently.","PeriodicalId":132360,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1825226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper proposes and tests a structural model reflecting the process of authorizing private-activity municipal bond issuance. Private-activity municipal bonds offer tax-exempt financing for programs including industrial development, utilities, low-income housing, and student loans. The Federal tax code sets annual caps on the total tax-exempt issuance within each state, so authorization becomes a scarce resource distributed via a political process. Interviews with program administrators in several states suggested the authorization process involves prioritizing categories of use, authorizing bonds for high-priority uses first, and then authorizing bonds for lower-priority uses until the cap is exhausted. A model representing this process suggests variables to include in reduced-form estimations and an alternative interpretation of the coefficients. The fit of the model can be improved by adding measures of political influence and imposing a structure that reflects the political prioritization process. In general, industrial development and utilities appear to be the highest priority uses of private-activity municipal bonds. Mortgage revenue bonds are the residual category most frequently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人活动的优先级-债券数量上限分配
本文提出并检验了一个反映民间活动市政债券发行授权过程的结构模型。私人活动市政债券为工业发展、公用事业、低收入住房和学生贷款等项目提供免税融资。联邦税法对每个州的免税发行总量设定了年度上限,因此授权成为通过政治程序分配的稀缺资源。对几个州的项目管理员的采访表明,授权过程包括对使用类别进行优先排序,首先为高优先级用途授权债券,然后为低优先级用途授权债券,直到上限耗尽。表示这一过程的模型建议将变量包括在约简形式估计中,并对系数进行另一种解释。可以通过增加政治影响的措施和施加反映政治优先次序过程的结构来改善模型的拟合性。一般来说,工业发展和公用事业似乎是私人活动市政债券的最优先用途。抵押收益债券是最常见的剩余类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the Stick Make the Carrot More Attractive? State Mandates and Uptake of Renewable Heating Technologies Strategic Inefficient Decentralization: Local and Regional Devolution as Substitutes The COVID-19 Pandemic and Small Business in Illinois: A Preliminary Comparison of Neighboring States The Blemish of Voter Apathy in Sustaining Democratic Governance in Nigeria: The Role of Political Parties How Local Leadership Rotation Breaks State-Business Ties in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1