Optimal Bi-Annual Tilt Angles and Optimal Tilt Transition Timing for Fixed Tilt Arrays in the United States

Essa Alhamer, Addison Grigsby, Rydge B. Mulford
{"title":"Optimal Bi-Annual Tilt Angles and Optimal Tilt Transition Timing for Fixed Tilt Arrays in the United States","authors":"Essa Alhamer, Addison Grigsby, Rydge B. Mulford","doi":"10.1115/es2022-84344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As global dependency on renewable energy grows, it is imperative to utilize every Photovoltaic (PV) panel in the most efficient way possible. An important consideration for increasing PV panel energy production is to carefully select the tilt angle relative to the ground of the installed panel. Tracking arrays resolve this issue by dynamically tracking the sun throughout the course of the day, but tracking technology includes additional capital costs and is not affordable for residential systems. The goals of this study are to explore the use of a bi-annual fixed tilt array, where the tilt angle of the fixed array is changed at two times in the year to better capture the seasonal variation in solar irradiation. The goal of this study is to use optimization techniques to resolve the ideal tilt angles as well as the optimal time to change between these two angles for every state in the continental United States. Biannual arrays are then compared to fixed tilt and 1D tracking arrays while examining local weather variations and their effect on the optimal PV tilt angle and solar PV production. In general, PV panels with a fixed tilt in states at higher latitudes collect 90% of the energy that a 1D tracking array would collect, whereas bi-annual tilt angle array produce on average 97% of the energy that a 1D tracking array collects, making the bi-annual tilt method nearly as effective as 1D tracking at these latitudes. Fixed tilt arrays in the southern United States collect on average 85% of the energy that a 1D tracking array would collect, whereas bi-annual tilt arrays in the southern United States produce at maximum 90% of the energy that a 1D tracking array produces. Nearly all states optimize energy production when the tilt angle is changed during the month of March and the month of August. This paper also examines the relationship between summer and winter temperatures and cloud cover, and their effect on optimal tilt and overall PV performance.","PeriodicalId":384147,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2022-84344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global dependency on renewable energy grows, it is imperative to utilize every Photovoltaic (PV) panel in the most efficient way possible. An important consideration for increasing PV panel energy production is to carefully select the tilt angle relative to the ground of the installed panel. Tracking arrays resolve this issue by dynamically tracking the sun throughout the course of the day, but tracking technology includes additional capital costs and is not affordable for residential systems. The goals of this study are to explore the use of a bi-annual fixed tilt array, where the tilt angle of the fixed array is changed at two times in the year to better capture the seasonal variation in solar irradiation. The goal of this study is to use optimization techniques to resolve the ideal tilt angles as well as the optimal time to change between these two angles for every state in the continental United States. Biannual arrays are then compared to fixed tilt and 1D tracking arrays while examining local weather variations and their effect on the optimal PV tilt angle and solar PV production. In general, PV panels with a fixed tilt in states at higher latitudes collect 90% of the energy that a 1D tracking array would collect, whereas bi-annual tilt angle array produce on average 97% of the energy that a 1D tracking array collects, making the bi-annual tilt method nearly as effective as 1D tracking at these latitudes. Fixed tilt arrays in the southern United States collect on average 85% of the energy that a 1D tracking array would collect, whereas bi-annual tilt arrays in the southern United States produce at maximum 90% of the energy that a 1D tracking array produces. Nearly all states optimize energy production when the tilt angle is changed during the month of March and the month of August. This paper also examines the relationship between summer and winter temperatures and cloud cover, and their effect on optimal tilt and overall PV performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国固定倾斜阵列的最佳两年倾斜角度和最佳倾斜过渡时间
随着全球对可再生能源的依赖日益增长,以最有效的方式利用每一块光伏(PV)电池板势在必行。增加光伏电池板发电量的一个重要考虑因素是仔细选择安装面板相对于地面的倾斜角度。跟踪阵列通过全天动态跟踪太阳来解决这个问题,但是跟踪技术包括额外的资本成本,并且对于住宅系统来说是负担不起的。本研究的目的是探索使用一年两次的固定倾斜阵列,其中固定阵列的倾斜角度在一年中改变两次,以更好地捕捉太阳辐照的季节性变化。本研究的目标是使用优化技术来解决理想的倾斜角,以及在这两个角度之间的最佳时间在美国大陆的每个州。然后将两年一次的阵列与固定倾斜和一维跟踪阵列进行比较,同时检查当地天气变化及其对最佳光伏倾斜角度和太阳能光伏产量的影响。一般来说,在高纬度地区,固定倾角的光伏板收集的能量是一维跟踪阵列收集能量的90%,而两年一次的倾角阵列平均产生的能量是一维跟踪阵列收集能量的97%,这使得两年一次的倾角方法几乎与这些纬度地区的一维跟踪方法一样有效。美国南部的固定倾斜阵列平均收集的能量是一维跟踪阵列收集的能量的85%,而美国南部的两年一次的倾斜阵列产生的能量最多是一维跟踪阵列产生的90%。当倾角在3月和8月改变时,几乎所有的州都优化了能源生产。本文还研究了夏季和冬季温度与云量之间的关系,以及它们对最佳倾斜和整体PV性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Passive Cooling Technology Performance Testing Methods Efficiency and Flexibility Improvement of Amine-Based Post Combustion CO2 Capturing System (CCS) in Full and Partial Loads Performance Measurement and Verification of Variable-Speed Packaged Rooftop Units Optimal Bi-Annual Tilt Angles and Optimal Tilt Transition Timing for Fixed Tilt Arrays in the United States Thermodynamic Modeling and Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle-Ejector Heat Pump-Based Trigeneration System Using a Zeotropic Mixture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1