From Forest Group to the America Invents Act: False Patent Marking Comes Full Circle

Nicholas Stephens
{"title":"From Forest Group to the America Invents Act: False Patent Marking Comes Full Circle","authors":"Nicholas Stephens","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1813422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Section 292 of the Patent Act forbids the false marking of unpatented or infringing articles with the type of marks usually used by patentees to provide public notice of their patented inventions. Prior to the recent enactment of patent reform, the statute provided a rare qui tam enforcement mechanism that allowed private individuals to enforce the criminal offense. But for much of its history, the law was rarely enforced. Then, in a 2009 decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit increased the potential awards for those bringing enforcement actions, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the volume of false-marking claims. In response to the slew of new false-marking suits, Congress amended § 292 in 2011 as part of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act. This Note reviews the impact of recent § 292 case law, analyzes the recent statutory amendments, and proposes guidelines for interpreting and enforcing the amended statute that will help to ensure it achieves its objective of curtailing false marking while minimizing the social costs of excessive litigation.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1813422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Section 292 of the Patent Act forbids the false marking of unpatented or infringing articles with the type of marks usually used by patentees to provide public notice of their patented inventions. Prior to the recent enactment of patent reform, the statute provided a rare qui tam enforcement mechanism that allowed private individuals to enforce the criminal offense. But for much of its history, the law was rarely enforced. Then, in a 2009 decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit increased the potential awards for those bringing enforcement actions, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the volume of false-marking claims. In response to the slew of new false-marking suits, Congress amended § 292 in 2011 as part of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act. This Note reviews the impact of recent § 292 case law, analyzes the recent statutory amendments, and proposes guidelines for interpreting and enforcing the amended statute that will help to ensure it achieves its objective of curtailing false marking while minimizing the social costs of excessive litigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从森林集团到美国发明法案:虚假专利标记兜了个圈
《专利法》第292条禁止在非专利或侵权物品上使用专利权人通常用于向公众提供其专利发明的标志类型的虚假标记。在最近颁布的专利改革之前,该法规提供了一种罕见的集体执行机制,允许私人执行刑事犯罪。但在其历史上的大部分时间里,这项法律很少得到执行。然后,在2009年的一项裁决中,联邦巡回上诉法院(Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit)增加了对那些提起执法行动的人的潜在赔偿,这导致了虚假评分索赔数量的急剧增加。为了应对大量新的虚假标记诉讼,国会于2011年修订了第292条,作为《莱希-史密斯美国发明法》的一部分。本文回顾了最近的§292判例法的影响,分析了最近的法定修订,并提出了解释和执行修订后的法规的指导方针,这将有助于确保其实现减少虚假标记的目标,同时最大限度地减少过度诉讼的社会成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antitrust Error Costs Bostock was Bogus: Textualism, Pluralism, and Title VII 5G Deployment: The Role and Challenges of Regulatory Bodies in Ensuring Convergence Within the EU Data Point: 2019 Mortgage Market Activity and Trends The CIA's Democratic Integrity: Information Sharing and Electoral Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1