Limitations on Granting Copyrights to AI-Generated Works and Alternative Protection Methodologies

Wonoh Kim
{"title":"Limitations on Granting Copyrights to AI-Generated Works and Alternative Protection Methodologies","authors":"Wonoh Kim","doi":"10.30582/kdps.2023.36.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of generative artificial intelligence technology, AI is emerging as a complete creative subject throughout the creative process. Therefore, in this paper, the concept of artificial intelligence-generated works (AGW) with minimal human intervention among AI-related creations is clearly defined through comparison with adjacent concepts, and then comprehensively summarizes the limitations of AGW protection in the interpretation of the current copyright law, and the international trend and overseas trends are briefly checked. Second, if it is difficult to protect by granting copyrights to AGW, first, consider how to leave it as a public domain, but also review the theoretical grounds for the theory of putting public domain and specific implementation methods thereof. Furthermore, we examine the limitations and problems of the theory of public domains, such as concerns about the possibility of abuse and false registration, as well as alternative solutions, to see what problems neglecting AGW, which is difficult to distinguish from human creation, can cause. Third, as a concrete protection methodology that has been discussed as an alternative solution, we look at the unification/dualization method and the method of subsuming within the copyright normative system or enacting a special law. In either way, the protection of AGW is premised on discriminatory protection, so this paper focuses on the theory of so-called ‘thin copyright protection’ and examines the key points that need to be reviewed in case of discriminatory protection.","PeriodicalId":350441,"journal":{"name":"Korea Copyright Commission","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Copyright Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2023.36.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the development of generative artificial intelligence technology, AI is emerging as a complete creative subject throughout the creative process. Therefore, in this paper, the concept of artificial intelligence-generated works (AGW) with minimal human intervention among AI-related creations is clearly defined through comparison with adjacent concepts, and then comprehensively summarizes the limitations of AGW protection in the interpretation of the current copyright law, and the international trend and overseas trends are briefly checked. Second, if it is difficult to protect by granting copyrights to AGW, first, consider how to leave it as a public domain, but also review the theoretical grounds for the theory of putting public domain and specific implementation methods thereof. Furthermore, we examine the limitations and problems of the theory of public domains, such as concerns about the possibility of abuse and false registration, as well as alternative solutions, to see what problems neglecting AGW, which is difficult to distinguish from human creation, can cause. Third, as a concrete protection methodology that has been discussed as an alternative solution, we look at the unification/dualization method and the method of subsuming within the copyright normative system or enacting a special law. In either way, the protection of AGW is premised on discriminatory protection, so this paper focuses on the theory of so-called ‘thin copyright protection’ and examines the key points that need to be reviewed in case of discriminatory protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授予人工智能生成作品版权的限制和替代保护方法
随着生成式人工智能技术的发展,人工智能正在作为一个完整的创作主体出现在整个创作过程中。因此,本文通过与相邻概念的比较,明确界定人工智能相关创作中人为干预最小的人工智能生成作品(AGW)的概念,然后全面总结当前著作权法解释中对人工智能生成作品保护的局限性,并对国际趋势和海外趋势进行简要梳理。其次,如果难以通过授予著作权的方式对其进行保护,首先要考虑如何将其作为公共领域,同时也要回顾公共领域设置理论的理论依据及其具体实施方法。此外,我们还研究了公共领域理论的局限性和问题,例如对滥用和虚假注册可能性的担忧,以及替代解决方案,以了解忽视难以与人类创造区分的AGW会导致什么问题。第三,作为一种具体的保护方法,作为一种替代解决方案,我们着眼于统一/二元化方法和纳入版权规范体系或制定专门法律的方法。无论哪种方式,对AGW的保护都是以歧视性保护为前提的,因此本文以所谓的“单薄版权保护”理论为重点,探讨在歧视保护的情况下需要审查的要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limitations on Granting Copyrights to AI-Generated Works and Alternative Protection Methodologies The Meaning and Content of Article 22, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution as a Standard for Constitutionality Review Determining Fair Use and the Role of Transformative Use Test: On the Rulings in Wofsy v. De Fontbrune Quo vadis, What will be the Future of Appropriation Art?: Focusing on “The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith” A Study on the Free Use of Public Works: Focused on the Seoul Central District Court’s 2019 Gadan 5207564 Decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1