Can ChatGPT Help College Instructors Generate High-quality Quiz Questions?

K. Lu
{"title":"Can ChatGPT Help College Instructors Generate High-quality Quiz Questions?","authors":"K. Lu","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ChatGPT is getting increasing attention in both academic and professional\n settings. Since its release, there has been a discussion on how services such as ChatGPT\n may change education. Many teachers have shared that they use ChatGPT to help them\n generate assignment prompts, questions, and lesson plans in various subject areas. Mixed\n opinions have been shared with regard to the quality of materials created by ChatGPT.\n While some teachers believe that the materials are of reasonable quality, others worry\n that ChatGPT may not always generate accurate or reliable information and may reproduce\n biases and stereotypes that exist in the data it was trained on. In this study, I\n explore the research question of whether ChatGPT can really replace teachers in\n generating high-quality assessment questions. Specifically, I compare ChatGPT-generated\n questions with instructor-written questions that have been used in two classes at a\n public research University in the US. The preliminary results show that although ChatGPT\n can produce logically sensible questions, the quality is not always comparable to\n instructor-written ones. The ChatGPT-generated questions are not specific to student\n misconceptions and do not align with the learning objectives instructors have in mind,\n which often leads to such questions being relatively obvious and easy to answer. I\n further discuss the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT in generating high-quality\n assessment questions. This study provides insights into how we may leverage advanced AI\n tools such as ChatGPT to support education.","PeriodicalId":383834,"journal":{"name":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ChatGPT is getting increasing attention in both academic and professional settings. Since its release, there has been a discussion on how services such as ChatGPT may change education. Many teachers have shared that they use ChatGPT to help them generate assignment prompts, questions, and lesson plans in various subject areas. Mixed opinions have been shared with regard to the quality of materials created by ChatGPT. While some teachers believe that the materials are of reasonable quality, others worry that ChatGPT may not always generate accurate or reliable information and may reproduce biases and stereotypes that exist in the data it was trained on. In this study, I explore the research question of whether ChatGPT can really replace teachers in generating high-quality assessment questions. Specifically, I compare ChatGPT-generated questions with instructor-written questions that have been used in two classes at a public research University in the US. The preliminary results show that although ChatGPT can produce logically sensible questions, the quality is not always comparable to instructor-written ones. The ChatGPT-generated questions are not specific to student misconceptions and do not align with the learning objectives instructors have in mind, which often leads to such questions being relatively obvious and easy to answer. I further discuss the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT in generating high-quality assessment questions. This study provides insights into how we may leverage advanced AI tools such as ChatGPT to support education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT可以帮助大学教师生成高质量的测验问题吗?
ChatGPT在学术和专业领域受到越来越多的关注。自从它发布以来,人们一直在讨论像ChatGPT这样的服务将如何改变教育。许多老师分享说,他们使用ChatGPT来帮助他们在各个学科领域生成作业提示、问题和课程计划。关于ChatGPT创建的材料的质量,人们有不同的意见。虽然一些老师认为这些材料的质量是合理的,但其他人担心ChatGPT可能并不总是产生准确或可靠的信息,并且可能会再现存在于其训练数据中的偏见和刻板印象。在本研究中,我探讨了ChatGPT是否真的可以代替教师生成高质量的评估问题。具体来说,我将chatgpt生成的问题与美国一所公立研究型大学的两节课中使用的教师写作问题进行了比较。初步结果表明,虽然ChatGPT可以产生逻辑合理的问题,但质量并不总是与教师写作的问题相媲美。chatgpt生成的问题不是针对学生的误解,也不符合教师心目中的学习目标,这通常会导致此类问题相对明显且易于回答。我进一步讨论了ChatGPT在生成高质量评估问题方面的能力和局限性。这项研究为我们如何利用ChatGPT等先进的人工智能工具来支持教育提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framework of Future Industrial Worker Characteristics On-Site and Remote Crowdsourcing of Accessibility Data for People with Mobility Impairments: A Case Study in Zurich’s District 1 Human-Centered Design of Voice Communications: Gender Aspects Engaging Students through Conversational Chatbots and Digital Content: A Climate Action Perspective The Course Glancer - Leveraging Interactive Visualization for Course Selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1