Memory latency in distributed shared-memory multiprocessors

B. S. Motlagh, R. Demara
{"title":"Memory latency in distributed shared-memory multiprocessors","authors":"B. S. Motlagh, R. Demara","doi":"10.1109/SECON.1998.673311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analytical models were developed and simulations of memory latency were performed for Uniform Memory Access (UMA), Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), Local-Remote-Global (LRG), and Replicated Concurrent-Read (RCR) architectures for hit rates from 0.1 to 0.9 in steps of 0.1, memory access times of 10 nsec to 100 nsec, proportions of read/write access from 0.01 to 0.1, and block sizes of 8 to 64 words. The RCR architecture based on redundant inexpensive DRAM is shown to provide favourable performance over UMA and NUMA architectures for application and system parameters in the range evaluated. RCR outperforms LRG architectures when the hit rates of the processor cache exceed 80% and hit rates of replicated memory exceed 25%. Inclusion of a small replicated memory at each processor significantly reduces expected access time since all replicated memory READ access hits become independent of global traffic. For configurations of up to 32 processors, results show that latency is further reduced by distinguishing burst-mode transfers between isolated memory accesses and those which are incrementally outside the working set.","PeriodicalId":281991,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '98 'Engineering for a New Era'","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '98 'Engineering for a New Era'","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1998.673311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Analytical models were developed and simulations of memory latency were performed for Uniform Memory Access (UMA), Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), Local-Remote-Global (LRG), and Replicated Concurrent-Read (RCR) architectures for hit rates from 0.1 to 0.9 in steps of 0.1, memory access times of 10 nsec to 100 nsec, proportions of read/write access from 0.01 to 0.1, and block sizes of 8 to 64 words. The RCR architecture based on redundant inexpensive DRAM is shown to provide favourable performance over UMA and NUMA architectures for application and system parameters in the range evaluated. RCR outperforms LRG architectures when the hit rates of the processor cache exceed 80% and hit rates of replicated memory exceed 25%. Inclusion of a small replicated memory at each processor significantly reduces expected access time since all replicated memory READ access hits become independent of global traffic. For configurations of up to 32 processors, results show that latency is further reduced by distinguishing burst-mode transfers between isolated memory accesses and those which are incrementally outside the working set.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式共享内存多处理器中的内存延迟
建立了分析模型,并对统一内存访问(UMA)、非统一内存访问(NUMA)、本地-远程-全局(LRG)和复制并发读(RCR)架构的内存延迟进行了模拟,其中命中率为0.1 ~ 0.9,步骤为0.1,内存访问时间为10 ~ 100 nsec,读写访问比例为0.01 ~ 0.1,块大小为8 ~ 64个字。在评估的应用和系统参数范围内,基于冗余廉价DRAM的RCR体系结构比UMA和NUMA体系结构提供了更好的性能。当处理器缓存的命中率超过80%,复制内存的命中率超过25%时,RCR优于LRG架构。在每个处理器上包含一个小的复制内存,这大大减少了预期的访问时间,因为所有复制内存的READ访问命中都独立于全局流量。对于多达32个处理器的配置,结果表明,通过区分隔离内存访问之间的突发模式传输和那些逐渐超出工作集的访问之间的突发模式传输,可以进一步减少延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pipelined query processor for distributed multi-databases Multiresolution decomposition techniques for robust signal processing Simulation of a spaceborne radar altimeter Internet based interactive multimedia transfers and applications VHDL for performance modeling of HLA-compliant simulations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1