Leveraging Real-world Data to Increase Procedure Room Capacity: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Project

Rachel Feldman, Daniel Low, Irina Gorbounova, L. Ambartsumyan, Lynn D Martin
{"title":"Leveraging Real-world Data to Increase Procedure Room Capacity: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Project","authors":"Rachel Feldman, Daniel Low, Irina Gorbounova, L. Ambartsumyan, Lynn D Martin","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the current healthcare climate, the financial strain created by COVID-19, limited resources, and case backlogs highlight the need to optimize operating and procedure room efficiency and maximize capacity. At Seattle Children’s, a clinical multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a data-driven protocol to improve efficiency in a high-volume gastrointestinal (GI) suite. Methods: Key process measures, including all case on-time starts and postanesthesia care unit length of stay, were extracted from the electronic medical record and presented as Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts. Clinicians’ performance was stratified by rational subgrouping to better understand variation in the system. We defined an expert clinician as one who performs beyond 3-sigma limits on funnel plot analyses. We developed clinical protocols based on expert clinician clinical practices. We gave clinicians dynamic, daily feedback on this family of measures through continuously updated SPC charts. This real-world data drove system and individual-level plan-do-check-act improvement cycles. Results: Despite significant external challenges over 2 years, procedure volume increased by approximately 25%, on-time starts improved by 36%, turnover time decreased by 34%, and postanesthesia care unit length of stay decreased by 15%. GI laboratory revenue increased by approximately 25% (independent of increased charges per procedure), representing the potential for a $2 million increase in annual revenue. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary clinical team improved efficiency metrics in a busy pediatric GI suite. Access to real-world data through continuously updated SPC charts enabled plan-do-check-act cycles that led to measurable improvement. This data access also served to sustain team motivation and engagement.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the current healthcare climate, the financial strain created by COVID-19, limited resources, and case backlogs highlight the need to optimize operating and procedure room efficiency and maximize capacity. At Seattle Children’s, a clinical multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a data-driven protocol to improve efficiency in a high-volume gastrointestinal (GI) suite. Methods: Key process measures, including all case on-time starts and postanesthesia care unit length of stay, were extracted from the electronic medical record and presented as Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts. Clinicians’ performance was stratified by rational subgrouping to better understand variation in the system. We defined an expert clinician as one who performs beyond 3-sigma limits on funnel plot analyses. We developed clinical protocols based on expert clinician clinical practices. We gave clinicians dynamic, daily feedback on this family of measures through continuously updated SPC charts. This real-world data drove system and individual-level plan-do-check-act improvement cycles. Results: Despite significant external challenges over 2 years, procedure volume increased by approximately 25%, on-time starts improved by 36%, turnover time decreased by 34%, and postanesthesia care unit length of stay decreased by 15%. GI laboratory revenue increased by approximately 25% (independent of increased charges per procedure), representing the potential for a $2 million increase in annual revenue. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary clinical team improved efficiency metrics in a busy pediatric GI suite. Access to real-world data through continuously updated SPC charts enabled plan-do-check-act cycles that led to measurable improvement. This data access also served to sustain team motivation and engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用真实世界数据增加手术室容量:一个多学科质量改进项目
简介:在当前的医疗环境下,COVID-19造成的财务压力、有限的资源和积压的病例凸显了优化手术室和手术室效率并最大限度地提高容量的必要性。在西雅图儿童医院,一个临床多学科团队开发并实施了一种数据驱动的方案,以提高大容量胃肠道(GI)套件的效率。方法:从电子病历中提取关键流程指标,包括所有病例的准时开始和麻醉后护理单位的住院时间,并以统计过程控制(SPC)图表的形式呈现。临床医生的表现通过合理的亚组分层,以更好地了解系统的变化。我们将专家临床医生定义为在漏斗图分析中执行超过3西格玛限制的人。我们根据临床专家的临床实践制定了临床方案。通过不断更新的SPC图表,我们为临床医生提供了动态的每日反馈。这些真实世界的数据驱动了系统和个人层面的计划-执行-检查-行动改进周期。结果:尽管在2年内存在显著的外部挑战,但手术量增加了约25%,准时开始改善了36%,周转时间减少了34%,麻醉后护理单位的住院时间减少了15%。GI实验室收入增加了约25%(不包括每次手术费用的增加),年收入可能增加200万美元。结论:多学科临床团队提高了繁忙的儿科GI套房的效率指标。通过不断更新的SPC图表访问实际数据,实现了计划-执行-检查-行动周期,从而实现了可衡量的改进。这种数据访问也有助于维持团队的积极性和参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1