Dispossession and Party Formation in Broader Comparative Perspective

Edwin F. Ackerman
{"title":"Dispossession and Party Formation in Broader Comparative Perspective","authors":"Edwin F. Ackerman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197576502.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter shows that rather than emerging from a ready-formed cohesive industrial labor movement, these parties’ original constituency was the demoted artisan and peasantry in transition to be, but not yet, proletarianized. Second, in a related way, the chapter shows that the period of party emergence followed a process of economic and political dispossession: these parties articulated new political subjectivities in the context of eroding traditional economic and political structures. The differences in the timing of party emergence between the countries lie precisely in how these processes of dispossession developed: in Germany, the process of economic dispossession coincided with a political dispossession setting the terrain for the mass-party form, while in the British case, economic dispossession was not initially accompanied by political dispossession of the working classes, who maintained a degree of self-presentational authority, particularly in the form of “friendly societies.”","PeriodicalId":223446,"journal":{"name":"Origins of the Mass Party","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Origins of the Mass Party","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197576502.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter shows that rather than emerging from a ready-formed cohesive industrial labor movement, these parties’ original constituency was the demoted artisan and peasantry in transition to be, but not yet, proletarianized. Second, in a related way, the chapter shows that the period of party emergence followed a process of economic and political dispossession: these parties articulated new political subjectivities in the context of eroding traditional economic and political structures. The differences in the timing of party emergence between the countries lie precisely in how these processes of dispossession developed: in Germany, the process of economic dispossession coincided with a political dispossession setting the terrain for the mass-party form, while in the British case, economic dispossession was not initially accompanied by political dispossession of the working classes, who maintained a degree of self-presentational authority, particularly in the form of “friendly societies.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较视野下的剥夺与政党形成
这一章表明,这些政党不是从一个现成的有凝聚力的工业工人运动中产生的,而是最初的支持者是处于过渡阶段(但尚未)无产阶级化的、被降级的工匠和农民。第二,本章以一种相关的方式表明,政党出现的时期伴随着经济和政治剥夺的过程:这些政党在侵蚀传统经济和政治结构的背景下阐明了新的政治主体性。两国之间政党出现时间的差异恰恰在于这些剥夺过程是如何发展的:在德国,经济剥夺的过程与政治剥夺相吻合,为群众政党形式奠定了基础,而在英国,经济剥夺最初并没有伴随着工人阶级的政治剥夺,工人阶级保持了一定程度的自我表现的权威,特别是以“友好社会”的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mexico and Bolivia in Comparative Perspective and the Sociology of Party Formation Conclusion Dispossession and Party Formation in Broader Comparative Perspective The Emergence of the PRI in Mexico The Failure of Party Formation in Bolivia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1