The Interpersonal Implications of Stealing the Glory

Jeremy Burrus, J. Kruger, K. Savitsky
{"title":"The Interpersonal Implications of Stealing the Glory","authors":"Jeremy Burrus, J. Kruger, K. Savitsky","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.946191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People tend to overestimate their contribution to joint tasks, in part because their own contributions are more memorable than the contributions of their collaborators. We examined some of the interpersonal consequences of this bias. Participants engaged in either a hypothetical (Experiment 2) or real (Experiment 1) cooperative task and learned how their collaborator ostensibly allocated responsibility. We varied how much credit the collaborator took for herself, and also how much credit she gave to the participant, factors confounded in past research. In each experiment, collaborators who stole the glory were seen as less fair, harder to get along with, and less honest than were collaborators who did not. Interestingly, this effect was driven by one's own contribution being underappreciated more than one's collaborator's contribution being overstated. Mediational analyses revealed that the discord could be traced to the attribution of biased responsibility judgments to self-interest on the part of one's collaborator.","PeriodicalId":199069,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

People tend to overestimate their contribution to joint tasks, in part because their own contributions are more memorable than the contributions of their collaborators. We examined some of the interpersonal consequences of this bias. Participants engaged in either a hypothetical (Experiment 2) or real (Experiment 1) cooperative task and learned how their collaborator ostensibly allocated responsibility. We varied how much credit the collaborator took for herself, and also how much credit she gave to the participant, factors confounded in past research. In each experiment, collaborators who stole the glory were seen as less fair, harder to get along with, and less honest than were collaborators who did not. Interestingly, this effect was driven by one's own contribution being underappreciated more than one's collaborator's contribution being overstated. Mediational analyses revealed that the discord could be traced to the attribution of biased responsibility judgments to self-interest on the part of one's collaborator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窃取荣誉的人际关系含义
人们倾向于高估自己在共同任务中的贡献,部分原因是他们自己的贡献比合作者的贡献更令人难忘。我们研究了这种偏见对人际关系的一些影响。参与者参与一个假设的(实验2)或真实的(实验1)合作任务,并了解他们的合作者表面上是如何分配责任的。我们改变了合作者自己的功劳,以及她给参与者的功劳,这些因素在过去的研究中混淆了。在每一个实验中,与不偷荣誉的合作者相比,偷荣誉的合作者被认为不公平,更难相处,也不诚实。有趣的是,造成这种效应的原因是自己的贡献被低估,而不是合作者的贡献被夸大。中介分析显示,这种不和谐可以追溯到有偏见的责任判断归因于合作者的自身利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Entrenchment and the Market for Talent SRI? I Don’t Buy it! (Because You’re Selling it Wrong) The 'Base of the Pyramid'-Concept: Integrative Business Models in Developing Countries (Das Konzept 'Base of the Pyramid': Integrative Geschäftsmodelle in Entwicklungsländern) How Firms Respond to Being Rated Wal-Mart and Values: Painting the Town Red?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1