Discussions of Chemical, Biological, and Economic Features of two FDA Authorized Antivirals Against COVID-19: Molnupiravir and Paxlovid

Jiaqi Dong
{"title":"Discussions of Chemical, Biological, and Economic Features of two FDA Authorized Antivirals Against COVID-19: Molnupiravir and Paxlovid","authors":"Jiaqi Dong","doi":"10.1145/3570773.3570807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Molnupiravir from Merck and Paxlovid from Pfizer are both promising. Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic due to infection of SARS-CoV-2 has posed a challenge to global healthcare systems. Although vaccines and potential treatments have been developed, there are still many unknown areas of this virus, and people are still searching for efficient ways to treat the disease. Recently, two oral antivirals for COVID-19, Molnupiravir from Merck and Paxlovid from Pfizer, were developed and given emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. FDA to reduce hospitalizations and death from COVID-19. Though the mechanism of action of the two drugs is very different, both drugs have shown promising efficacy in treating COVID-19 infections. This paper will compare these two drugs in various aspects, including their chemical structures, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety, and drug economics.","PeriodicalId":153475,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3570773.3570807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molnupiravir from Merck and Paxlovid from Pfizer are both promising. Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic due to infection of SARS-CoV-2 has posed a challenge to global healthcare systems. Although vaccines and potential treatments have been developed, there are still many unknown areas of this virus, and people are still searching for efficient ways to treat the disease. Recently, two oral antivirals for COVID-19, Molnupiravir from Merck and Paxlovid from Pfizer, were developed and given emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. FDA to reduce hospitalizations and death from COVID-19. Though the mechanism of action of the two drugs is very different, both drugs have shown promising efficacy in treating COVID-19 infections. This paper will compare these two drugs in various aspects, including their chemical structures, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety, and drug economics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA批准的两种抗COVID-19抗病毒药物:莫努皮拉韦和Paxlovid的化学、生物学和经济特性的讨论
默克公司的Molnupiravir和辉瑞公司的Paxlovid都很有前景。自2019年12月以来,由SARS-CoV-2感染引起的COVID-19大流行对全球卫生保健系统构成了挑战。尽管已经开发出疫苗和潜在的治疗方法,但这种病毒仍有许多未知的领域,人们仍在寻找治疗这种疾病的有效方法。最近,两种针对COVID-19的口服抗病毒药物——默克公司的Molnupiravir和辉瑞公司的Paxlovid——被开发出来,并获得了美国FDA的紧急使用授权(EUA),以减少COVID-19的住院和死亡。虽然两种药物的作用机制有很大的不同,但两种药物在治疗COVID-19感染方面都显示出很好的疗效。本文将从化学结构、作用机制、疗效和安全性、药物经济学等方面对两种药物进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine Breast Density Segmentation in Mammograms Based on Dual Attention Mechanism Standardization of clinical terminology based on hybrid recall and Ernie A Study on the Demand and the Influencing Factors of Smart Healthcare Services for the Elderly in Harbin: Based on The Anderson Health Behaviour Model The spatial migration pattern of Hg content for the prediction of disease during a long time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1