Less Favored – More Favored? Women’s Approaches to Property After Re-marriage During the Second Half of the 18th Century

Grochowina Grochowina
{"title":"Less Favored – More Favored? Women’s Approaches to Property After Re-marriage During the Second Half of the 18th Century","authors":"Grochowina Grochowina","doi":"10.7146/fof.v44i3.132988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the greater interest in the relationship between gender and history, as it has been emphasized after the “cultural turn” of the 1990s, questions concerning women’s roles in early modern legal practice became an important focus of research, too. First of all, criminal laws came into view: Questions were raised, why women were being hunted as witches, and whether they should be regarded as victims of the legal system. Furthermore, studies asked, how gender was constructed, when, for instance, fornication was being tried at court. \nDespite these efforts, research did not focus on civil legal practice with the same inten-sity. It appeared, that corresponding cases were regarded as less spectacular than issues of criminal law. Moreover, the existence of several judicial instruments like the guardianship seemed to have suggested that women could not be regarded as independently acting subjects of law. Instead, they were expelled from early modern legal culture. Nevertheless, it has to be argued, that such an impression is not sufficient enough to understand the relationship be-tween gender and law in the early modern society. In fact, it appears that women were not excluded from civil legal practice at all. Studies on marriage, marriage contracts and inheri-tance of women suggest a different picture.","PeriodicalId":219437,"journal":{"name":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fund og Forskning i Det Kongelige Biblioteks Samlinger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/fof.v44i3.132988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the greater interest in the relationship between gender and history, as it has been emphasized after the “cultural turn” of the 1990s, questions concerning women’s roles in early modern legal practice became an important focus of research, too. First of all, criminal laws came into view: Questions were raised, why women were being hunted as witches, and whether they should be regarded as victims of the legal system. Furthermore, studies asked, how gender was constructed, when, for instance, fornication was being tried at court. Despite these efforts, research did not focus on civil legal practice with the same inten-sity. It appeared, that corresponding cases were regarded as less spectacular than issues of criminal law. Moreover, the existence of several judicial instruments like the guardianship seemed to have suggested that women could not be regarded as independently acting subjects of law. Instead, they were expelled from early modern legal culture. Nevertheless, it has to be argued, that such an impression is not sufficient enough to understand the relationship be-tween gender and law in the early modern society. In fact, it appears that women were not excluded from civil legal practice at all. Studies on marriage, marriage contracts and inheri-tance of women suggest a different picture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少受青睐还是多受青睐?18世纪下半叶女性再婚后对财产的态度
由于在20世纪90年代的“文化转向”之后,人们对性别与历史之间的关系越来越感兴趣,关于女性在早期现代法律实践中的角色的问题也成为研究的重要焦点。首先,刑法进入了人们的视野:人们提出了一些问题,为什么妇女被当作女巫追捕,她们是否应该被视为法律制度的受害者。此外,研究还询问,例如,当法庭审判通奸时,性别是如何建构的。尽管做出了这些努力,但对民事法律实践的研究却没有达到同样的高度。看来,相应的案件被认为没有刑法问题那么引人注目。此外,像监护制度这样的几个司法文书的存在似乎表明,不能把妇女视为独立行动的法律主体。相反,他们被驱逐出早期现代法律文化。然而,必须指出的是,这样的印象不足以理解早期现代社会性别与法律的关系。事实上,妇女似乎根本没有被排除在民事法律业务之外。对婚姻、婚姻契约和女性继承权的研究显示出不同的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ingeniøren og de ægyptiske mumier: En kioskbasker fra 1910’erne En engelsk bogskat i Det Kgl. Bibliotek, Aarhus “Vi har tæmmet Rejselystens ubændige Tiger for en Stund” Skibe på et hav af manuskripter: om Håndskriftsamlingens skibe Kamante og Lulu i Amerika
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1