Comparison of Clinical Pathway Mode with Traditional Mode in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculus

Weiguo Ma, S. Jin, Lili Ma, Rui Fang, Tong-fang Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Pathway Mode with Traditional Mode in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculus","authors":"Weiguo Ma, S. Jin, Lili Ma, Rui Fang, Tong-fang Zhang","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.926114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To compare the differences between the clinical pathway mode and the traditional mode implemented in the treatment of ureteral calculus by referring to different parameters, and to analyze the reasons. Method. A total of 164 cases of ureteral calculus fall into four groups: group A: treating only the calculus with clinical pathway; group B: treating the calculus and other diseases with clinical pathway; group C; treating only the calculus with the traditional mode; group D: treating the calculus and other diseases with the traditional mode. All patients were treated with ureteroscopic ballistic lithotripsy under various types of anesthesia. There were 56 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 46 cases in group C, and 32 cases in group D. The statistical methods were used for comparing the following parameters: preoperative average length of stay, average length of stay, total hospitalization expense, drug expense proportion, antibacterial drug expense proportion, and patient satisfactio...","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.926114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractObjective. To compare the differences between the clinical pathway mode and the traditional mode implemented in the treatment of ureteral calculus by referring to different parameters, and to analyze the reasons. Method. A total of 164 cases of ureteral calculus fall into four groups: group A: treating only the calculus with clinical pathway; group B: treating the calculus and other diseases with clinical pathway; group C; treating only the calculus with the traditional mode; group D: treating the calculus and other diseases with the traditional mode. All patients were treated with ureteroscopic ballistic lithotripsy under various types of anesthesia. There were 56 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 46 cases in group C, and 32 cases in group D. The statistical methods were used for comparing the following parameters: preoperative average length of stay, average length of stay, total hospitalization expense, drug expense proportion, antibacterial drug expense proportion, and patient satisfactio...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管结石的临床路径模式与传统模式的比较
AbstractObjective。通过参考不同参数,比较临床路径模式与传统模式在输尿管结石治疗中的差异,并分析其原因。方法。164例输尿管结石分为四组:A组:仅用临床途径治疗输尿管结石;B组:采用临床路径治疗结石等疾病;C组;用传统模式只处理微积分;D组:用传统模式治疗结石等疾病。所有患者均在不同麻醉方式下行输尿管镜弹道碎石术。A组56例,B组30例,C组46例,d组32例。采用统计学方法比较术前平均住院时间、平均住院时间、总住院费用、药费占比、抗菌药物占比、患者满意度等参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discussion on the Method of Classifi cation of Medical Syndromes in the ICD-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions A Discussion on ICD-10 Coding of Infantile Diarrheal Disease Predictive Analysis of Outpatient Volumes of a First-class Grade A General Hospital through ARIMA Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1