Does joint decoding really outperform cascade processing in English-to-Chinese transliteration generation? The role of syllabification

Yan Song, C. Kit
{"title":"Does joint decoding really outperform cascade processing in English-to-Chinese transliteration generation? The role of syllabification","authors":"Yan Song, C. Kit","doi":"10.1109/ICMLC.2010.5580674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transliteration is a challengeable task aimed at converting a proper name into another language with phonetic equivalence. Since the conversion relates to the phonetic aspect of a text, syllabification is considered a major factor affecting the performance of a transliteration system. In grapheme-based approaches, there are two routines to transliterate, one is to perform in a pipeline of separate syllabification and other components in generation process step by step, the other is to synchronously segment syllables and generating transliteration options. Usually, joint decoding outperforms the cascade processing in many natural language processing missions, however, syllabification is a special component in transliteration task. Thus in this paper, we investigate the two routines with a systematic analysis and compare their results to illustrate the strength of syllabification. A phrase-based statistical machine translation framework for joint decoding and a conditional random field syllabification system are used in this work for our investigation, which shows a different scenario on the issue of joint decoding versus cascade processing in transliteration.","PeriodicalId":126080,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2010.5580674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Transliteration is a challengeable task aimed at converting a proper name into another language with phonetic equivalence. Since the conversion relates to the phonetic aspect of a text, syllabification is considered a major factor affecting the performance of a transliteration system. In grapheme-based approaches, there are two routines to transliterate, one is to perform in a pipeline of separate syllabification and other components in generation process step by step, the other is to synchronously segment syllables and generating transliteration options. Usually, joint decoding outperforms the cascade processing in many natural language processing missions, however, syllabification is a special component in transliteration task. Thus in this paper, we investigate the two routines with a systematic analysis and compare their results to illustrate the strength of syllabification. A phrase-based statistical machine translation framework for joint decoding and a conditional random field syllabification system are used in this work for our investigation, which shows a different scenario on the issue of joint decoding versus cascade processing in transliteration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合解码在英汉音译生成中真的优于级联处理吗?音节化的作用
音译是一项具有挑战性的任务,其目的是将专有名称转换成语音对等的另一种语言。由于转换与文本的语音方面有关,因此音节化被认为是影响音译系统性能的主要因素。在基于字素的方法中,音译有两种例程,一种是在生成过程中由单独的音节和其他组件组成的管道中逐步执行,另一种是同步分割音节并生成音译选项。通常,在许多自然语言处理任务中,联合解码优于级联处理,而音节化是音译任务中的一个特殊组成部分。因此,在本文中,我们对这两个例程进行了系统的分析,并比较了它们的结果,以说明音节化的强度。本文采用基于短语的联合译码统计机器翻译框架和条件随机场音节系统,研究了联合译码与级联译码的不同情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does joint decoding really outperform cascade processing in English-to-Chinese transliteration generation? The role of syllabification The design of energy-saving filtering mechanism for sensor networks Feature-based approach combined with hierarchical classifying strategy to relation extraction The comparative study of different Bayesian classifier models New inverse halftoning using texture-and lookup table-based learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1