Observing Instructor Behaviour in an Active Learning Classroom: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Calculus Course

Iflah Shahid, Allison Van Beek, S. McCahan
{"title":"Observing Instructor Behaviour in an Active Learning Classroom: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Calculus Course","authors":"Iflah Shahid, Allison Van Beek, S. McCahan","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active learning classrooms (ALCs) are spaces explicitly designed to encourage collaborative learning, often through the use of technology. To learn more about teaching activity in ALCs, a study was designed to observe an engineering calculus course during the winter 2020 term. A large-scale active learning classroom was selected for classroom observation using the extended Teaching Dimensions Observation Tool (TDOP+). The TDOP+ is a descriptive classroom observation protocol based on the Teaching Dimensions Observation Tool, enhanced with elements from the Active Learning Classroom Observation Tool (ALCOT).   \nThis case study compares the class orchestration of different instructors teaching two different sections of the same course at a large, public university. Twenty class sessions were coded for this study: 10 for each section (5 for each instructor). The coded instructor behaviour was analyzed using a conceptual framework described by Nocera (i.e., a version of Activity Theory), focusing on mediating artifacts and instructor goals.   \nWhile we observed differences in the frequency and duration of active learning activities and in the type and number of tools used in each class session, the results from this case study suggest that flexible space design enables instructors with the same lesson plan (and content) to create different technological frames to achieve their varied pedagogical goals, while encouraging increased adoption of new tools.  ","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active learning classrooms (ALCs) are spaces explicitly designed to encourage collaborative learning, often through the use of technology. To learn more about teaching activity in ALCs, a study was designed to observe an engineering calculus course during the winter 2020 term. A large-scale active learning classroom was selected for classroom observation using the extended Teaching Dimensions Observation Tool (TDOP+). The TDOP+ is a descriptive classroom observation protocol based on the Teaching Dimensions Observation Tool, enhanced with elements from the Active Learning Classroom Observation Tool (ALCOT).   This case study compares the class orchestration of different instructors teaching two different sections of the same course at a large, public university. Twenty class sessions were coded for this study: 10 for each section (5 for each instructor). The coded instructor behaviour was analyzed using a conceptual framework described by Nocera (i.e., a version of Activity Theory), focusing on mediating artifacts and instructor goals.   While we observed differences in the frequency and duration of active learning activities and in the type and number of tools used in each class session, the results from this case study suggest that flexible space design enables instructors with the same lesson plan (and content) to create different technological frames to achieve their varied pedagogical goals, while encouraging increased adoption of new tools.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察教师在主动学习课堂中的行为:以大学微积分课程为例
主动学习教室(ALCs)是明确设计用于鼓励协作学习的空间,通常通过使用技术。为了更多地了解alc的教学活动,我们设计了一项研究,观察2020年冬季学期的工程微积分课程。采用扩展教学维度观察工具(TDOP+)选择一个大型主动学习课堂进行课堂观察。TDOP+是一个描述性的课堂观察协议,基于教学维度观察工具,增强了主动学习课堂观察工具(ALCOT)的元素。本案例研究比较了一所大型公立大学中不同教师对同一课程的两个不同部分的教学编排。本研究共编码了20节课:每节10节(每位教师5节)。使用Nocera描述的概念框架(即活动理论的一个版本)分析了编码的教师行为,重点关注中介工件和教师目标。虽然我们观察到主动学习活动的频率和持续时间以及每次课堂使用的工具的类型和数量的差异,但本案例研究的结果表明,灵活的空间设计使具有相同课程计划(和内容)的教师能够创建不同的技术框架来实现他们不同的教学目标,同时鼓励更多地采用新工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Makes an Exemplary Engineering Leader? In the Words of Engineers Questioning Green Growth and Sustainable Development in Undergraduate Engineering Memorization: Friend or Foe when Solving Problems in STEM Undergraduate Courses Persistent mistakes in learning basic circuit analysis Development and Assessment of a Training Module on Intellectual Property Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1