Three traction motors with different magnet materials — Influence on cost, losses, vehicle performance, energy use and environmental impact

E. Grunditz, S. Lundmark, M. Alatalo, T. Thiringer, Anders Nordelof
{"title":"Three traction motors with different magnet materials — Influence on cost, losses, vehicle performance, energy use and environmental impact","authors":"E. Grunditz, S. Lundmark, M. Alatalo, T. Thiringer, Anders Nordelof","doi":"10.1109/EVER.2018.8362387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of reducing both cost and environmental impact of automotive electric traction motors motivates the examination of motor performance when using magnets of varying strength and materials. Such investigations have attracted increasing interest in recent years. Given the same take-off torque capability, three motors are compared that have the same stator geometry but different magnet materials in the rotor; two PMSMs — one with Nd(Dy)FeB and one with SmCo magnets — and one PMaSynRM with strontium-ferrite magnets. To compensate the weaker magnets, their corresponding core stacks are prolonged. The resulting torque capability at high speed levels is lower for the SmCo PMSM and ferrite PMaSynRM compared to the Nd(Dy)FeB PMSM. The ferrite PMaSynRM has the poorest dynamic vehicle performance, but also the lowest energy losses over a wide range of drive cycles. In addition, the ferrite based motor option has the lowest environmental impact during manufacturing as well as the lowest material cost estimate. The SmCo motor has slightly lower losses than the Nd(Dy)FeB, but the highest material cost. Certainly, the result signals that further in-depth studies of the described PMaSynRM are of high relevance.","PeriodicalId":344175,"journal":{"name":"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Thirteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EVER.2018.8362387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The aim of reducing both cost and environmental impact of automotive electric traction motors motivates the examination of motor performance when using magnets of varying strength and materials. Such investigations have attracted increasing interest in recent years. Given the same take-off torque capability, three motors are compared that have the same stator geometry but different magnet materials in the rotor; two PMSMs — one with Nd(Dy)FeB and one with SmCo magnets — and one PMaSynRM with strontium-ferrite magnets. To compensate the weaker magnets, their corresponding core stacks are prolonged. The resulting torque capability at high speed levels is lower for the SmCo PMSM and ferrite PMaSynRM compared to the Nd(Dy)FeB PMSM. The ferrite PMaSynRM has the poorest dynamic vehicle performance, but also the lowest energy losses over a wide range of drive cycles. In addition, the ferrite based motor option has the lowest environmental impact during manufacturing as well as the lowest material cost estimate. The SmCo motor has slightly lower losses than the Nd(Dy)FeB, but the highest material cost. Certainly, the result signals that further in-depth studies of the described PMaSynRM are of high relevance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同磁铁材料的牵引电机-对成本、损耗、车辆性能、能源使用和环境影响的影响
为了降低汽车电动牵引电机的成本和对环境的影响,在使用不同强度和材料的磁铁时,对电机性能进行了检查。近年来,这类调查引起了越来越多的兴趣。在起飞转矩能力相同的情况下,对定子几何形状相同但转子磁体材料不同的三种电机进行了比较;两个永磁同步电动机-一个带有Nd(Dy)FeB磁铁和一个带有SmCo磁铁-和一个带有锶铁氧体磁铁的永磁同步电动机。为了补偿较弱的磁体,相应的磁芯堆被延长。与Nd(Dy)FeB永磁同步电动机相比,SmCo永磁同步电动机和铁氧体永磁同步电动机在高速水平下的扭矩能力较低。铁氧体PMaSynRM具有最差的车辆动态性能,但在大范围的驱动循环中也具有最低的能量损失。此外,基于铁氧体的电机选项在制造过程中对环境的影响最小,并且材料成本估计最低。SmCo电机的损耗略低于Nd(Dy)FeB,但材料成本最高。当然,结果表明,进一步深入研究所描述的PMaSynRM是高度相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of an axial-flux permanent magnet machine for a solar-powered electric vehicle Soft-landing control of low-energy solenoid valve actuators Three traction motors with different magnet materials — Influence on cost, losses, vehicle performance, energy use and environmental impact Experimental comparison of energy management strategies for a hybrid electric bus in a test-bench Analysis and design of bi-directional DC-DC converters for ultracapacitors management in EVs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1