Perceived usefulness of the introductory statistics course as a correlate of student engagement in statistics

R. Hassad
{"title":"Perceived usefulness of the introductory statistics course as a correlate of student engagement in statistics","authors":"R. Hassad","doi":"10.52041/srap.17312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some non-academic factors, particularly perceived usefulness, are salient determinants of student success, and engagement in a discipline. This study explored the association between college students’ ratings of the usefulness of an introductory statistics course, their beliefs about where statistics will be most useful, and their intentions to take another statistics course. A cross-sectional study of 106 students was conducted. The mean rating for usefulness was 4.7 (out of 7), with no significant difference by gender and age. Sixty-four percent reported that they would consider taking another statistics course, and that subgroup rated the course as more useful (p = .01). Thirty-five percent reported that statistics would be most useful for graduate school, 32% research, 14% their job, and 19% were undecided. The “undecided” students rated statistics as less useful (p = .001). Instructors should emphasize practical examples of the use of data in real-world problem-solving and decision-making. Qualitative research methods could help to elucidate these findings.","PeriodicalId":421900,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Statistics in a Data Rich World IASE Satellite Conference","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Statistics in a Data Rich World IASE Satellite Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.17312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some non-academic factors, particularly perceived usefulness, are salient determinants of student success, and engagement in a discipline. This study explored the association between college students’ ratings of the usefulness of an introductory statistics course, their beliefs about where statistics will be most useful, and their intentions to take another statistics course. A cross-sectional study of 106 students was conducted. The mean rating for usefulness was 4.7 (out of 7), with no significant difference by gender and age. Sixty-four percent reported that they would consider taking another statistics course, and that subgroup rated the course as more useful (p = .01). Thirty-five percent reported that statistics would be most useful for graduate school, 32% research, 14% their job, and 19% were undecided. The “undecided” students rated statistics as less useful (p = .001). Instructors should emphasize practical examples of the use of data in real-world problem-solving and decision-making. Qualitative research methods could help to elucidate these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统计入门课程的感知有用性与学生参与统计相关
一些非学术因素,特别是感知有用性,是学生成功和参与一门学科的显著决定因素。本研究探讨了大学生对统计学入门课程有用性的评分,他们对统计学在哪里最有用的信念,以及他们选修另一门统计学课程的意图之间的联系。对106名学生进行了横断面研究。有用性的平均评分为4.7(满分7分),性别和年龄没有显著差异。64%的人报告说他们会考虑选修另一门统计学课程,并且该小组认为这门课程更有用(p = 0.01)。35%的人认为统计学对研究生最有用,32%的人认为统计学对研究最有用,14%的人认为统计学对他们的工作最有用,19%的人还没有决定。“未决定”的学生认为统计数据不太有用(p = .001)。教师应强调在现实问题解决和决策中使用数据的实际例子。定性研究方法可以帮助阐明这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tools for visualizing data: a review From kindergarten to elderly people. A macro view of the teaching of statistics Plenary lecture: statistics capacity building in a developing country – experiences, opportunities and challenges What are the mathematics houses in Iran and what they have done to popularize statistics? Describing data well in r-instat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1