Australian Refugee Policy and its Impacts on Pacific Island Countries

B. Opeskin, Daniel Ghezelbash
{"title":"Australian Refugee Policy and its Impacts on Pacific Island Countries","authors":"B. Opeskin, Daniel Ghezelbash","doi":"10.33318/jpacs.2016.36(1)-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refugees present an immense challenge globally but until recently Pacific Island Countries (PICs) have been relatively sheltered from this phenomenon. However, changes to Australia’s border security and refugee policies in recent years have significant implications for the Pacific because of Australia’s determination to prevent asylum seekers from arriving by boat in Australian territory. This article examines Australia’s so-called ‘Pacific Solution’, which entails the transfer of asylum seekers to camps in Nauru and Papua New Guinea, where they are detained pending determination of their refugee status and ultimate resettlement. The social impacts of Australia’s policies include the heightened tensions that arise from establishing large detention facilities in small island communities, and the social costs of resettling persons who are found to be refugees among poor local populations. Australia’s policies also have other impacts on PICs. Australia’s selective allocation of foreign aid and other funds make PICs vulnerable to pressure from its developed neighbour, and create the danger that Australia’s perceived ‘problem’ with unauthorised boat arrivals is being shifted to acquiescent countries in the Pacific.","PeriodicalId":346996,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Migration eJournal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Migration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33318/jpacs.2016.36(1)-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Refugees present an immense challenge globally but until recently Pacific Island Countries (PICs) have been relatively sheltered from this phenomenon. However, changes to Australia’s border security and refugee policies in recent years have significant implications for the Pacific because of Australia’s determination to prevent asylum seekers from arriving by boat in Australian territory. This article examines Australia’s so-called ‘Pacific Solution’, which entails the transfer of asylum seekers to camps in Nauru and Papua New Guinea, where they are detained pending determination of their refugee status and ultimate resettlement. The social impacts of Australia’s policies include the heightened tensions that arise from establishing large detention facilities in small island communities, and the social costs of resettling persons who are found to be refugees among poor local populations. Australia’s policies also have other impacts on PICs. Australia’s selective allocation of foreign aid and other funds make PICs vulnerable to pressure from its developed neighbour, and create the danger that Australia’s perceived ‘problem’ with unauthorised boat arrivals is being shifted to acquiescent countries in the Pacific.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚难民政策及其对太平洋岛国的影响
难民在全球范围内是一个巨大的挑战,但直到最近,太平洋岛屿国家(PICs)一直相对受到保护,没有出现这种现象。然而,近年来澳大利亚边境安全和难民政策的变化对太平洋地区产生了重大影响,因为澳大利亚决心阻止寻求庇护者乘船抵达澳大利亚领土。本文审查了澳大利亚所谓的“太平洋解决方案”,其中包括将寻求庇护者转移到瑙鲁和巴布亚新几内亚的难民营,在确定其难民身份和最终重新安置之前,他们被拘留在那里。澳大利亚政策的社会影响包括在小岛屿社区建立大型拘留设施所引起的紧张局势加剧,以及在当地贫困人口中重新安置发现为难民的人的社会成本。澳大利亚的政策还对海外移民产生了其他影响。澳大利亚对外国援助和其他资金的选择性分配,使海外移民容易受到来自其发达邻国的压力,并造成危险,即澳大利亚认为的未经授权的船只抵达的“问题”正在转移到太平洋上默许的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Value of Formal Host-Country Education for the Labour Market Position of Refugees: Evidence from Austria Migration and Spatial Misallocation in China Does The Internet Enhance State Capacity To Alleviate Distress Wage Theft, Economic Conditions, and Market Power: The Case of H-1B Workers Review of the gravity model: a physical approach to social sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1