The State, Democracy, and Class Rule: Remarks on the Hoppean Approach

Norbert Slenzok
{"title":"The State, Democracy, and Class Rule: Remarks on the Hoppean Approach","authors":"Norbert Slenzok","doi":"10.35757/civ.2021.28.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject-matter of the paper is the theory of class struggle proposed by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, one of the leading representatives of libertarian political philosophy in the radical tradition of Murray N. Rothbard. The author reconstructs and critically comments on the theory at hand. The author's remarks focus on the ethical and methodological background of Hoppe's approach, the main question being whether the latter theory is consonant with the thinker's positions on ethics and methodology, as well as with his political standpoint. The author argues that not only does class analysis not contradict other core beliefs of Hoppe but it also represents an indispensable element of his libertarian philosophy. There is, however, a significant tension between the class approach and Hoppe's secondary philosophical position – his historical idealism. The article is concluded by indicating some further issues in the Hoppean theory of class that, in the author's opinion, should be subject to future inquiry.","PeriodicalId":350409,"journal":{"name":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civitas. Studia z Filozofii Polityki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/civ.2021.28.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject-matter of the paper is the theory of class struggle proposed by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, one of the leading representatives of libertarian political philosophy in the radical tradition of Murray N. Rothbard. The author reconstructs and critically comments on the theory at hand. The author's remarks focus on the ethical and methodological background of Hoppe's approach, the main question being whether the latter theory is consonant with the thinker's positions on ethics and methodology, as well as with his political standpoint. The author argues that not only does class analysis not contradict other core beliefs of Hoppe but it also represents an indispensable element of his libertarian philosophy. There is, however, a significant tension between the class approach and Hoppe's secondary philosophical position – his historical idealism. The article is concluded by indicating some further issues in the Hoppean theory of class that, in the author's opinion, should be subject to future inquiry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家、民主与阶级统治:评霍普方法
本文的主题是汉斯-赫尔曼·霍普(Hans-Hermann Hoppe)提出的阶级斗争理论,他是穆雷·罗斯巴德激进传统中自由意志主义政治哲学的主要代表之一。作者对现有的理论进行了重构和批判性的评论。作者的评论集中在霍普方法的伦理和方法论背景上,主要问题是后者的理论是否与思想家在伦理和方法论上的立场以及他的政治立场一致。作者认为,阶级分析不仅没有与霍普的其他核心信念相矛盾,而且还代表了他的自由意志主义哲学中不可或缺的元素。然而,在阶级方法和霍普的第二哲学立场——他的历史唯心主义之间存在着显著的张力。文章最后指出了霍普阶级理论中的一些进一步的问题,在作者看来,这些问题应该受到未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narracja filozoficzna a koncepcje postwzrostowe Uatlantydzenie opowieści jako strategia wyjścia z realizmu kapitalistycznego Skażenie jako współpraca, przeł. A. Brylska, M. Rogowska-Stangret Wszystkie jutra: Trwająca miliard lat kronika niezliczonych gatunków i różnorakich losów człowieka (fragmenty), przeł. M. Rzepa Ekosocjalizm: między ruchem społecznym a teorią marksowską
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1