Designing major appliances: A decision support model

Eleonora Fiore, P. Tamborrini, M. Norese
{"title":"Designing major appliances: A decision support model","authors":"Eleonora Fiore, P. Tamborrini, M. Norese","doi":"10.1109/EGG.2016.7829816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although competitors from low-cost countries are pushing manufacturers to lowering prices and replace the production [1] at the expense of quality, the definition of new scenarios through research and development seems the best way to succeed. This paper seeks to explain why companies should invest in the redesign of household appliances when there is a potential improvement in the sustainability of the product. This work considers home appliances investigating their disassembly, the updating of components and the management of end of life, combined with their connectivity and the communication with the final user. This research develops a multi-criteria model to select among the major appliances the most suitable to redesign, providing a ranking of alternatives. The analysis is based on the potential improvement on eco-design of products, determined on eight relevant criteria about sustainability and relationship between users and appliances. This study attempts to prove that business models based on Multi Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) methodology, combined with two design approaches to sustainability, are able to move from linear to circular economy. Waste management and product refurbishment - through Design by Components focused on product maintenance and replacement of its parts - are, in fact, key aspects to achieve valuable results. The paper proposes an analysis of this decision process, synthesizing the most critical aspects and the result of a Multi Criteria Decision Aid intervention [2].","PeriodicalId":187870,"journal":{"name":"2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EGG.2016.7829816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although competitors from low-cost countries are pushing manufacturers to lowering prices and replace the production [1] at the expense of quality, the definition of new scenarios through research and development seems the best way to succeed. This paper seeks to explain why companies should invest in the redesign of household appliances when there is a potential improvement in the sustainability of the product. This work considers home appliances investigating their disassembly, the updating of components and the management of end of life, combined with their connectivity and the communication with the final user. This research develops a multi-criteria model to select among the major appliances the most suitable to redesign, providing a ranking of alternatives. The analysis is based on the potential improvement on eco-design of products, determined on eight relevant criteria about sustainability and relationship between users and appliances. This study attempts to prove that business models based on Multi Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) methodology, combined with two design approaches to sustainability, are able to move from linear to circular economy. Waste management and product refurbishment - through Design by Components focused on product maintenance and replacement of its parts - are, in fact, key aspects to achieve valuable results. The paper proposes an analysis of this decision process, synthesizing the most critical aspects and the result of a Multi Criteria Decision Aid intervention [2].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计主要设备:决策支持模型
尽管来自低成本国家的竞争对手正在迫使制造商降低价格,以牺牲质量为代价取代产品[1],但通过研发来定义新场景似乎是取得成功的最佳途径。本文试图解释为什么公司应该投资于家电的重新设计,当有一个潜在的改进,在产品的可持续性。这项工作考虑了家用电器的拆卸,组件的更新和寿命结束的管理,结合它们的连接和与最终用户的通信。本研究开发了一个多标准模型来选择最适合重新设计的主要电器,提供了一个替代方案的排名。该分析基于产品生态设计的潜在改进,确定了八个有关可持续性和用户与电器之间关系的相关标准。本研究试图证明,基于多标准决策辅助(MCDA)方法的商业模式,结合两种可持续性设计方法,能够从线性经济转向循环经济。废物管理和产品翻新——通过侧重于产品维护和部件更换的组件设计——实际上是取得有价值成果的关键方面。本文提出了对这一决策过程的分析,综合了多标准决策辅助干预的最关键方面和结果[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recovery of PC/ABS from WEEE plastic shred by the CreaSolv® process The complexity of value: Considerations for WEEE, experience from lighting products, and implications for policy A life cycle assessment of waste management: A case study of used ICT products sold in the BoP markets “Public procurement barriers in promoting market uptake of innovative LED lighting” Sustainability indicators for information and communication technology solutions and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1